Judge Bars Journalist's Testimony in Jackson Trial, but Allows Jurors to See 'Boy' Books

But they won a minor victory when the judge agreed that prosecutors could show jurors two books filled with photos -- some nude -- of young boys. "Boys Will Be Boys" and "The Boy: A Photographic Essay" were seized by police during a raid of Jackson's Neverland ranch in 1993.

The "escaping" testimony was important to prosecutors because it would have bolstered their allegation that Jackson held his then-13-year-old accuser and his family at Neverland against their will. Jackson also is charged with conspiracy in the alleged captivity, as well as giving liquor to a minor.

But after a hearing outside the presence of the jury, Santa Barbara Superior Court Judge Rodney S. Melville concluded that the testimony from Ian Drew, an editor for Us Weekly, would have been of dubious value.

Melville held the hearing to determine how much of Drew's testimony would be admissible under California's shield law. Under the law, journalists can not be compelled to reveal confidential sources or answer questions in court about information they have not published.

Just days from wrapping up their case, prosecutors wanted jurors to hear just one thing from Drew. The journalist had told investigators that Ronald Konitzer, formerly one of Jackson's top assistants and one of five uncharged alleged co-conspirators, told him in February 2003 that a scheduled interview with the alleged victim's family was off.

"I was told they had disappeared," Drew said in court. "I believe the word 'escaped' was used." But prosecutors could present Drew's testimony to jurors only if Jackson attorney Thomas A. Mesereau Jr. could cross-examine him.

That grilling would have been an empty exercise, Melville decided, because Drew could legitimately fend off almost every question by citing the state's shield law. In fact, when Mesereau, with jurors still absent, asked him seemingly innocuous test questions, such as "Where did the conversation take place?", Kelli Sager, a 1st Amendment attorney representing Drew, successfully objected.

Also, Drew told the judge that he may not have heard Konitzer say "escaped."