Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

A SUPREME COURT NOMINEE

Voices

July 20, 2005

'The president has chosen someone with suitable legal credentials, but that is not the end of our inquiry. The Senate must review Judge Roberts' record to determine if he has a demonstrated commitment to the core American values of freedom, equality and fairness.'

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.)

'Judge Roberts is the kind of outstanding nominee that will make America proud. He embodies the qualities America expects in a justice on its highest court: someone who is fair, intelligent, impartial and committed to faithfully interpreting the Constitution and the law.'

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.)

'We are extremely disappointed that President Bush has chosen such a divisive nominee for the highest court in the nation, rather than a consensus nominee who would protect individual liberty and uphold Roe vs. Wade.'

NARAL Pro-Choice America

Roberts 'rules based on the application of existing laws and specific facts of the cases before him, rather than making new laws or creating new policies based on personal opinion.'

Sean Rushton, executive director of the conservative Committee for Justice

'I look forward to the committee's findings so that I can make an informed decision about whether Judge Roberts is truly a guardian of the rule of law who puts fairness and justice before ideology.'

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.)

'He's the kind of judge that all of us want -- someone committed to applying the law impartially rather than legislating from the bench.'

Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah)

'John Roberts' record raises serious concerns as well as questions about where he stands on crucial legal and constitutional issues. Replacing [Justice Sandra Day] O'Connor with someone who is not committed to upholding Americans' rights, liberties and legal protections would be a constitutional catastrophe.'

Ralph G. Neas, president of the liberal People for the American Way

'The burden is on a nominee to the Supreme Court to prove that he is worthy, not on the Senate to prove he is unworthy.'

Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.)

'Without prejudging the nominee, I do believe Judge Roberts' record raises questions about his commitment to the right to privacy, protection of the environment and other important issues.'

Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.)

'Liberal pressure groups will insist that Senate Democrats filibuster against Judge Roberts, unless he pledges in advance to vote against allowing elected legislators to place meaningful limits on abortion.'

Douglas Johnson,

legislative director of the National Right to Life Committee

'I urge the Senate to move swiftly to hold hearings and give Judge Roberts an up-or-down vote. Quick action will ensure that both branches -- the Congress and the Supreme Court -- can return to their normal process without long, distracting partisan disruption.'

House Speaker

J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.)

'Senate Democrats, especially those seeking reelection next year, should know that we will be watching them carefully. If they again attempt to attack a nominee's faith or pro-life convictions, their constituents will know about it and they will be held accountable.'

Father Frank A. Pavone, national director, Priests for Life

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|