'Deep Throat' Is Unmasked. Who Cares?

The disclosure that W. Mark Felt, formerly the No. 2 official at the FBI, was Bob Woodward's famous Watergate source, "Deep Throat," has received a flurry of media attention normally reserved for such world-shattering events as a tsunami, the death of a pope or a runaway bride. Some perspective is in order.

Admittedly, the unmasking of the whistle-blower who helped Woodward and Carl Bernstein, of the Washington Post, assemble key pieces of the Watergate puzzle is not without importance. A president resigned amid scandal, a constitutional crisis was overcome: It's natural to seek clues about how Richard Nixon's presidency unraveled.

The news, moreover, should dispel the delusions of those who have claimed that Throat was a fabrication or a composite of several people. It should silence the conspiracy-mongers who have speculated that he was a Pentagon hawk -- Alexander Haig, perhaps -- who may have opposed detente with the Soviet Union and therefore contrived to oust Nixon.

It should end, too, one of the longest-running (and most enjoyable) floating parlor games for political junkies. Former Nixon aides John W. Dean III and Leonard Garment, as well as others who wrote books about Throat, should be glad they got their royalty checks when they did. Bill Gaines, the journalism professor whose classes researched the Throat mystery year after year, will need a new syllabus.

But if the guessing game was diverting -- as in fun -- it also diverted discussion from more significant aspects of Watergate. This week's revelation doesn't change our understanding of the crisis in any fundamental way.

For one thing, many people suspected all along that Felt was Throat, despite his denials. (Woodward never ruled out Felt, though he did rule out a few other possibilities.) Although few people knew Throat's identity with certainty, the revelation is more a thrill than a surprise. It's not as if Deep Throat turned out to be former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger or Nixon's son-in-law, David Eisenhower -- disclosures that might well have rattled notions about Watergate, forcing historians to rethink Nixon's relationship to those closest to him.

In fact, for a senior FBI man to have distrusted Nixon, and to have abhorred the illegal actions in his White House, makes perfect sense. The FBI-White House tensions in those years are well documented. In 1970, FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover himself snuffed out a controversial and probably illegal scheme to centralize intelligence-gathering in the White House.