Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

THE JACKSON VERDICTS | THE KEY TO THE CASE

'The Mother ... Was a Disaster'

June 14, 2005|Henry Weinstein and Maura Dolan | Times Staff Writers

Eight months ago, defense attorney Thomas A. Mesereau Jr. made a strategic move that may have provided the key to Michael Jackson's court victory: He hired a new private investigator and told him to focus relentlessly on the accuser's mother.

Scott Ross had worked on the Robert Blake defense, digging up unsavory items about the actor's murdered wife. The information allowed defense lawyers to argue that someone other than Blake, who was charged with killing her, had a motive. Moreover, the details gave jurors a reason to dislike the dead woman.

Mesereau wanted a repeat performance, and he gave his investigator a simple, blunt instruction, Ross recalled Monday: "I want you to do to [the mother of the alleged victim] what you did to Bonny Lee Bakley."

Monday, as the Jackson jurors talked about their deliberations, they made clear how well Mesereau's strategy had succeeded.

"What mother in her right mind would ... just freely volunteer your child to sleep with someone, and not so much just Michael Jackson but anyone, for that matter? That is something mothers are naturally concerned with," juror Pauline Coccoz of Santa Maria, a 45-year-old mother of three, said at a post-verdict news conference.

For The Record
Los Angeles Times Tuesday June 21, 2005 Home Edition Main News Part A Page 2 National Desk 1 inches; 58 words Type of Material: Correction
Tom Sneddon -- A caption in Wednesday's Section A with a photograph of Santa Barbara County Dist. Atty. Tom Sneddon said that he was standing outside the courthouse where a jury acquitted singer Michael Jackson of all charges in his molestation case. Sneddon was standing outside the Santa Barbara County Courthouse in Santa Barbara, not in Santa Maria.

Juror Eleanor Cook, a 79-year-old grandmother, spoke of her distaste for the mother's demeanor. The juror "disliked it intensely when she snapped her fingers at us," she said. "I thought, 'Don't snap your fingers at me, lady.' "

Juror Susan Rentschler, 52, of Lompoc, said she was "very uncomfortable" with the way the mother kept staring at jurors as she testified.

Mesereau's strategy triumphed. But ironically, it was a decision by prosecutors that made it possible.

Rather than file a narrow case against Jackson that would have turned on only the testimony of Jackson's youthful accuser, Santa Barbara County Dist. Atty. Tom Sneddon gambled that a broader indictment would have a greater chance of success. The indictment included a conspiracy charge centering on accusations that Jackson's aides had conspired to kidnap the mother and keep her at Neverland, the star's ranch.

"The prosecutor went for every strategic advantage. He thought he could broaden the case with the conspiracy charge," said Loyola Law School professor Laurie Levenson. "By doing that, he made the mother the focus of the case, and it backfired on him."

Analysts on Monday called Sneddon's decision a fundamental miscalculation.

Because Sneddon put the mother on the stand, Mesereau was able to give the jury the allegations that Ross and other investigators had dug up: that the mother had committed welfare fraud, that she had lied in a previous civil suit against J.C. Penney Co., that she had left Neverland to get her legs waxed at precisely the time she later claimed she was being held at the ranch against her will.

"The mother was the weakest link in the case. She was walking, talking reasonable doubt," said Levenson, a former federal prosecutor who closely followed the case against Jackson.

In a news conference after the verdict, Sneddon declined to comment on the conspiracy charge or discuss the way his case was structured. "I'm not going to look back and apologize for anything that we've done," he said. "You don't look at the pedigree of your witnesses."

Sneddon mentioned only "the celebrity factor" -- Jackson's fame, saying "it seems to us [it] ... played a key part here.

"But maybe we're just looking for explanations in the wrong places," he said.

Several analysts suggested he was.

Although Jackson's celebrity -- and his money -- clearly helped, the prosecution's conspiracy charge was a critical weak link in the case, they said.

"If your case is about an adult male molesting a male child, you put on that case," said Michael Brennan, a clinical law professor at USC and former criminal defense lawyer who followed the case.

"The conspiracy case was not necessary, and what it did was force the prosecution to put on the mother, who in turn was a disaster," he said.

Seattle attorney Anne Bremner, who attended many sessions of the trial, said the defense made the most of the mother's checkered past.

"The mother had such a history of false claims," she said. "The mother should not have been called as a witness. She undermined the entire state case."

Mesereau and his team attacked the credibility of the accuser and his mother. They hammered home a portrayal of the accusers as a money-hungry family who were counting on a settlement from Jackson. At least one juror said that image stuck with her during deliberations.

In what trial experts described as an unusually aggressive defense tactic, Jackson's side also presented evidence about the mother outside court. An attorney hired by Jackson, Carl A. "Tony" Capozzola of Redondo Beach, sent a thick dossier to Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley's office calling for the mother to be prosecuted on charges of bilking the welfare system. The mother had concealed a $150,000 court settlement, Capozzola alleged.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|