Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

RUMBLE SEAT DAN NEIL

For the Civic-minded

Like other hybrids, this Honda makes you feel good by saving gas. But it looks cool too.

October 12, 2005|DAN NEIL

IN the two years since I began working for the Los Angeles Times, hybrid automotive technology has matured dramatically. I can't say as much for the automotive consumer.

In a strange analog to the culture wars over abortion and gay marriage, a debate is raging in the automotive blogosphere over the value and credibility of hybrid technology. You would hope that such a technical debate would be nonpartisan. You would hope in vain. One correspondent derides the economics of hybrids, dismissing the technology as an emotional sop for liberals, "pure tree-hugging feel-goodism for the 'Save the Whales' and 'Free Tibet' folks."

I encourage you to visit websites such as www.autoextremist.com or www.autoblog.com to see for yourself, but let me summarize: Hybrid doubters complain that the cars don't return real-world mileage anything like the fuel economy numbers posted by the EPA; that diesel powertrains are inherently cheaper, more durable and efficient; that there are far too many unknowns regarding hybrid battery life and the costs of replacing or recycling these batteries; that too often, this technology is used to make cars bigger and faster -- e.g., the Honda Accord V6 hybrid -- and that it helps "greenwash" the image of a company such as Toyota that, like mean old GM, makes thousands of large trucks and SUVs; and finally -- this is a big one -- that the extra cost of a hybrid vehicle over a conventional vehicle (the hybrid "premium") cannot be recouped in fuel savings in a reasonable amount of time.

Energizing all of these objections is a larger, darker suspicion that hybrids represent some sort of fraud -- "magical thinking," one calls it -- and that insufficiently critical mainstream journalists are complicit. One note-poster summarizes the mood with perfect concision: "green=liberal=enemy."

ONCE you cut through the political animus, you find these are all reasonable concerns. For example, hybrid cars typically do not deliver EPA-rated fuel economy; the reason is the government's testing regime, which predates hybrid powertrains (the EPA is preparing new testing standards now).

Meanwhile, manufacturers are responding to this objection. The EPA rates the 2006 Honda Civic hybrid at 50 miles per gallon city and 50 mpg highway. Honda's testing puts those numbers at more modest 47/49 mpg and suggests real-world results of around 44 mpg, which is still pretty amazing.

As for the larger objection -- that hybrids don't pay for themselves -- that objection was certainly true two years ago, when gas was $2 per gallon, but it's a much closer call now that gas is roughly $3 per gallon.

Pull out your calculators. Let's say I was interested in a 2006 Honda Civic -- because, well, I am -- and I was debating between the sedan and the hybrid. With a navigation system, the hybrid costs $23,350; a similarly equipped Civic EX sedan costs $20,560. The hybrid premium equals $2,790.

The combined fuel economy of the non-hybrid is 35 mpg; the hybrid, 50 mpg, a theoretical difference of 15 mpg. In five years of average driving (15,000 miles per year), I would save 643 gallons, or $1,929 (assuming a gas price of $3 per gallon), with the hybrid. Combined with the current tax deduction (a savings of $580 in my tax bracket) I recoup 90% of the hybrid premium in five years. If I were to buy the Honda Civic hybrid in January 2006, the numbers look even better. The federal tax deduction becomes a credit worth $2,100. Combined with my fuel savings I actually come out about $1,200 ahead.

Now, put your calculators away, because the point is not whether I, or you, will recoup penny-for-penny the hybrid investment, since the compensations are not exclusively monetary. The hybrid haters actually have a valid point when they declaim the technology as touchy-feely. Its appeal is emotional, but that's not the same as irrational.

The reason hybrid cars are flying off dealers' lots is not because they make such a galvanizing financial brief. It's because people of goodwill, conservative and liberal, are growing weary of the moral calculus of gasoline. What people are learning is that private choices have public consequences. Sure, I'll make my money back, but the more important thing is the 643 gallons of liquid crack I will save. Now that's conservative.

Almost lost in all this is just how amazing these machines are. The Honda Civic hybrid is a five-passenger, full-featured sedan measuring 176.7 inches long; it's packed with safety features, everything from compatibility-minded body structures (helping to protect occupants in collisions with heavier, higher vehicles such as SUVs) to an energy-absorbing hood to help lessen impacts to pedestrians. And yet, loaded like Tara Reid on Ibiza, the car weighs only 2,875 pounds, aces Honda's internal tests mimicking the government's frontal and side-impact resilience, gets in excess of 40 mpg and has almost immeasurably clean emissions. Such a car was the stuff of science fiction 10 years ago.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|