WHEN SHE turned in her responses to a Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire on Tuesday, Supreme Court nominee Harriet E. Miers probably didn't know she was also handing editorial pages -- including this one -- 57 pages of enticing fodder.
The New York Times today doubts Miers can even "satisfactorily fill out a questionnaire," let alone sit on the Supreme Court. Its editorial calls her response to a question on judicial activism a "model of windy obfuscation." Top Judiciary Committee members asked Miers to give the questionnaire another try, giving her the distinction, the Times says, of being "the most important judicial nominee in history to be offered what amounts to a do-over on a take-home quiz."
