YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

The Nation

California Considers Further Limits

State law now restricts seizures of private land to blighted areas. Stricter rules might be on the November ballot.

April 16, 2006|Jordan Rau and Virginia Ellis

SACRAMENTO — California law restricts the use of eminent domain to areas that the government has decreed are blighted.

A Democratic proposal pending in the Legislature would tighten the rules of how property could be seized. But it does not go far enough for Republicans, whose stricter measures have been rebuffed in the Democratic-led body, and they are trying to take the issue to the November elections.

Sen. Tom McClintock (R-Thousand Oaks) has made the subject a central part of his campaign for lieutenant governor. In addition, property rights backers have submitted initiatives.

The one considered to have the best chance of making it on the November ballot is a constitutional amendment called the Protect Our Homes Act. The Fund for Democracy, a property rights group whose leaders include libertarian developer and term-limits advocate Howie Rich, last month contributed $1.5 million for signature collection.

Dave Gilliard, a Republican consultant working on the effort, said the campaign had collected nearly half a million of the 598,105 signatures necessary to place it on the ballot, and that it expected to file the petitions for verification with elections officials next month.

Like some of the other ballot proposals, the Protect Our Homes Act would amend the constitution to ban the seizure of property for private uses.

But it would also expand the definition of who is affected by government takings in ways that would allow neighboring property owners to receive compensation if their assets became devalued as a result -- a potentially costly change for governments.

Some local governments, including the Orange County Board of Supervisors, are putting eminent domain measures before voters.

Jordan Rau and Virginia Ellis

Los Angeles Times Articles