YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

California and the West

Congress Examines Title Insurance

A report cites recent federal and state probes that allege illegal kickback schemes.

April 27, 2006|From the Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Title insurance, an expensive and often confusing home-buying requirement that costs people $17 billion each year, came under congressional scrutiny Wednesday over allegations of kickbacks and other abuses.

Premiums can account for as much as one-third of the closing costs in purchasing a home. The more expensive the property, the higher the premium. The average title policy in California, for example, runs about $1,400.

Kickback schemes "have inflated the price of title insurance for thousands of people," Rep. Michael Oxley (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said at a subcommittee hearing.

Erin Toll, the deputy insurance commissioner in Colorado, called it a "black market" in title insurance.

When financing a home mortgage, lenders require title insurance to protect homeowners and lenders against potential ownership claims to the property or liens. The insurance is sold mainly through title insurance agents. Most people do not shop around and simply use the title insurance agent recommended by the mortgage lender, real estate agent or lawyer.

Title insurance companies often are fully or partly owned by real estate lenders and brokers. Such an arrangement, regulators say, can create conflicts of interest.

A report by congressional auditors cites recent federal and state inquiries that have identified "potentially illegal" activities -- mainly involving alleged kickbacks. These investigations have uncovered instances of real estate agents, mortgage lenders and brokers receiving referral fees in return for steering business to title insurance companies or agents, in apparent violation of federal and state laws.

Investigators have found "shell" title agencies created by title agents and mortgage brokers that have no physical location or employees and did not perform any title insurance business. They allegedly existed only to conceal referral payments.

Last year, the Housing and Urban Development Department settled 10 investigations of real estate and title insurance agencies in Georgia, Michigan, Oklahoma and Tennessee. The agencies paid a total $1.5 million to resolve the cases.

Regulators in Arizona, California, Colorado, Michigan and New York recently have taken enforcement actions against alleged kickback schemes.

Rande Yeager, president of the American Land Title Assn., said there was "intense competition" in the title insurance industry.

"Indeed, it is because of this intense competition that some companies have engaged in kickback and referral-fee arrangements in order to increase or maintain their market shares," Yeager said.

Consumers have "for too long been burdened with excessive title insurance charges," Robert Hunter, director of insurance for the Consumer Federation of America, said at the hearing.

One solution would mean changing the system to require lenders to pay for title insurance, said Hunter, a former Texas insurance commissioner.

Or, he said, Congress could require that an ownership right to a property is established by the act of registering in an official government record.

Los Angeles Times Articles