Advertisement

Gibson Uses Plea Deal to Resolve Case

The actor must attend AA meetings, pay a fine and make public service announcements after his lawyer enters no-contest plea on his behalf.

August 18, 2006|Andrew Blankstein, By Andrew Blankstein Times Staff Writer

Mel Gibson agreed to attend Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, perform public service announcements and pay $1,300 in fines as part of a plea agreement the actor reached Thursday with prosecutors to resolve his drunk driving charges.

Gibson was scheduled to be arraigned Sept. 28, but his attorneys informed prosecutors early Thursday that they were ready to make an immediate plea in Los Angeles County Superior Court in Malibu.


Advertisement

As a result, the proceeding occurred without intense media glare and was over in a matter of minutes.

The quick resolution means that the Gibson case is pretty much over, unless a judge finds that he violated the terms of the deal.

The agreement placed Gibson on three years of what is called "supervised probation," meaning that he has to return to court periodically to show that he is abiding by the terms of his probation.

Gibson was not present for the hastily convened hearing in the courtroom of Judge Lawrence J. Mira, who has presided over several other cases involving celebrities such as Robert Downey Jr., Nick Nolte, Gary Busey and Charlie Sheen.

It was Gibson's attorney, Blair Berk, who entered a plea of no contest to one misdemeanor count of driving with an alcohol level of 0.08% or above.

Two other charges, including driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with an open container of alcohol, were dropped as part of the deal.

Gibson, who has issued two public apologies for his behavior during the incident, must attend regular Alcoholics Anonymous meetings for a year, go into rehab treatment and have his license restricted for 90 days by the Department of Motor Vehicles.

He also volunteered to do a public service announcement on the hazards of drinking and driving and was fined $1,300.

Legal experts called the resolution fairly routine for a first-time DUI case in California that caused no injuries.

"The only departure from the standard terms are the AA meetings required by the court," said Darren T. Kavinoky, a Woodland Hills-based defense attorney who specializes in drug and drunk driving cases. "But generally speaking, this settlement reflects a standard outcome."

Kavinoky said prosecutors could have charged Gibson with additional crimes such as a "speed enhancement" for going 20 mph over the speed limit, which would require a two-month jail sentence. But he and others said such an enhancement was far from automatic in such cases.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|