Advertisement

Governor demands changes in lethal injection protocol

The mandate comes in response to a judge's ruling that the procedure violates the Constitution.

December 19, 2006|Henry Weinstein | Times Staff Writer

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Monday ordered his administration to fix problems in California's lethal injection protocol "to ensure the death penalty procedure is constitutional."

Schwarzenegger acted in response to a stinging decision issued Friday by U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel in San Jose, who said the state's system "is broken, but ... can be fixed."

"I am committed to doing whatever it takes to ensure that the lethal injection process is constitutional so that the will of the people is followed and the death penalty is maintained in California," Schwarzenegger said in a formal statement. "My administration will take immediate action to resolve court concerns which have cast legal doubt on California's procedure for carrying out the death penalty."

Fogel, who earlier visited the death chamber in San Quentin and held a four-day hearing in September, said the evidence "is more than adequate to establish" that the state's implementation of its lethal injection procedure violates the Constitution's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The judge gave state officials 30 days to let him know what they planned to do and he urged the governor to get involved.

Fogel listed a number of serious problems with how the death penalty is implemented in California, including inconsistent and unreliable screening of execution team members; poorly trained staff; inconsistent and unreliable recordkeeping of drugs used in the process; improper mixing, preparation and administration of drugs by the execution team; overcrowded conditions; and poorly designed facilities in which the execution team must work. He also blasted state personnel involved in the process for a "pervasive lack of professionalism."

California's current lethal injection procedure, like that in three dozen other states, calls for a three-drug process. The first drug, sodium thiopental, is a fast-acting barbiturate that is supposed to render the condemned inmate unconscious before the second two drugs -- pancuronium bromide, which paralyzes the body, and potassium chloride, which causes cardiac arrest -- are administered.

Fogel's ruling was in response to a lawsuit filed earlier this year by condemned inmate Michael Morales, who has been on death row at San Quentin State Prison for nearly a quarter-century after being convicted of murdering Lodi teenager Terri Winchell with a claw hammer in 1981. The thrust of Morales' suit is that the state does not properly administer enough sodium thiopental to deaden the pain of the potassium chloride.

The suit contends that a condemned man would be unable to scream out in pain because he has been paralyzed by the second drug.

"Anomalies in six execution logs raise substantial questions as to whether certain inmates may have been conscious when pancuronium bromide or potassium chloride was injected," Fogel wrote in his decision Friday. In addition, he said that Dr. Robert Singler, the state's medical expert in the lethal injection case, said that another condemned inmate "well may have been awake when he was injected with potassium chloride" during his March 27, 2001, execution.

On Monday, Schwarzenegger issued a statement indicating that the judge's stern message had resonated with him.

The governor said his top legal and correctional officials "will lead an effort to implement a screening process and undertake a comprehensive training program for execution team members, create standardized recordkeeping, recommend how to improve the death penalty facility and identify the best experts in other states to advise the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation on lethal injection and its implementation."

Schwarzenegger "is appropriately assuming responsibility for correcting the deficiencies in the state's protocol," said Fordham University law professor Deborah Denno, an expert on methods of punishment who has followed the California case closely. "At the same time, it is unclear whether the governor will order hearings of the type requested" by Morales' attorneys in a companion case in Marin County Superior Court, Denno said.

In that case, Morales' attorneys contended that state officials "unilaterally adopted the ... protocol in complete disregard for California's Administrative Procedure Act," which established the procedures by which agencies may adopt regulations.

The California attorney general's office contends that the act does not apply to the adoption of the lethal injection protocol.

A hearing is expected to be held on the issue early next year.

"It would be a huge development if they had to do this publicly," said Ginger Anders, a Washington, D.C., attorney who is one of Morales' lawyers.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|