Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsBabies

Keeping up with mother's milk

No formula has been invented that nourishes a baby as well, but the makers keep trying.

February 20, 2006|Alice Lesch Kelly | Special to The Times

Parents selecting baby formula have their work cut out for them. Supermarkets contain shelves full of choices, with new ones seemingly coming all the time.

There are formulas designed for babies with fussiness or gas, formulas made with organic ingredients, and formulas enriched with omega-3 fatty acids, suggested to enhance vision and brain development. Future formulas may contain the live bacteria found in yogurt.

Such a wide array of options can baffle parents, and many may be tempted to buy brands with recipes rejigged in response to the latest nutritional discoveries. But in fact, child nutrition experts say these new products may not benefit babies as much as their ads suggest -- and that any brand, including less expensive ones, will offer adequate nutrition, although none as good as breast milk. All must meet strict standards set by the Food and Drug Administration.

"There's very little difference, frankly -- they just tweak it a little," says Linda Heller, a registered dietitian and clinical nutrition manager at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles.

Formula makers hint, and some parents hope, that such tweaks will enhance the development and health of a baby.

A developing substitute

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that women breastfeed exclusively until babies are 6 months old. Only about one-third of women do so.

The alternative, infant formula, is historically fairly new. Until the Civil War, babies who were not breastfed received milk from cows or donkeys.

Then in 1867, Henri Nestle (a Swiss pharmacist who later founded the Nestle food company) developed an infant formula made with malt, cow's milk, sugar and wheat flour.

It took a while for Nestle's invention to catch on. During the first half of the 20th century, most mothers weren't convinced they needed commercial formula. When not breastfeeding their babies, they made their own concoctions with evaporated milk, water and table sugar or corn syrup.

Commercial formulas begin to gain wide acceptance during the post-World War II baby boom years. Many doctors began to believe that formula was more nutritious than breast milk. By the 1970s, just 25% of babies -- a record low -- were still being breastfed by the time they were discharged from the hospital. (Today, that number is 70%.)

Formula companies keep trying to emulate human milk, but the mixture still differs from the real stuff in key ways. "We know a lot about what's in breast milk, but it's hard to replicate all the ingredients," says Dr. Richard J. Deckelbaum, a professor of pediatric nutrition at Columbia University and chairman of the Institute of Medicine's infant formula safety committee.

Those ingredients include, among other things, living cells, hormones, active enzymes and antibodies that fight infection.

Such differences appear to have real health effects. Studies have found that breastfed babies have lower rates of pneumonia, bronchitis, colds, meningitis, urinary tract infections, asthma, ear infections and possibly sudden infant death syndrome.

Studies also suggest that people who were breastfed are less likely to become overweight or obese and to develop breast cancer, allergies, insulin-dependent diabetes, and chronic intestinal diseases such as Crohn's disease.

And, intriguingly, several large studies have shown that breastfed babies have IQs that are, on average, about six points higher than formula-fed babies.

Re-formulating

As they work to close the breast milk-formula gap, manufacturers have been tweaking recipes pretty much since the substance was invented.

In the 1960s, for example, they started adding iron to formula, which led to a significant drop in the incidence of iron-deficiency anemia in bottle-fed babies.

In the 1990s, manufacturers started enriching formula with nucleotides, chemicals present in breast milk that are the building blocks of the body's genetic material, after studies showed that babies fed formula with nucleotides had less diarrhea.

Likewise, different brands have been introduced to meet special needs of some babies. In 1929, for example, manufacturers discovered cow's milk formulas bothered some babies, and introduced soy-based formula.

Later they learned that lactose, a natural sugar in milk, gave some babies colic-like symptoms such as fussiness, gas and diarrhea. And so, in the 1990s, they developed lactose-free formulas.

Manufacturers have also developed formulas for babies with allergies. Made with hydrolyzed protein, they are easier to digest and reduce the likelihood of triggering an allergic reaction. (A 2005 study found that such formula, compared with standard types, may help prevent the development of allergies in babies whose parents suffer from them.)

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|