YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

The Nation

Fatal Bolt Illuminates Boy Scouts' Questionable Record

The youth group is being sued by parents whose son died in a Pennsylvania storm. Some see a pattern of safety problems.

January 08, 2006|David Crary | Associated Press Writer

CLIFTON, N.J. — The forecast was ugly the day Matthew Tresca died.

The National Weather Service had warned throughout the afternoon that severe weather was coming to the area in the Pocono Mountains where the 16-year-old and more than 300 other Boy Scouts were attending a one-week camp.

As lightning flashed in the distance, Scout leaders dismissed the boys from the dining hall right after supper and sent them to their tented campsites in the woods. Around 7 p.m., lightning struck a tent pole near the picnic table where Matthew sat under a tarp. He suffered cardiac arrest and was pronounced dead within 90 minutes.

That was Aug. 2, 2002. Since then, his parents have pursued a lawsuit against the Boy Scouts of America and the Scout council that ran the Pennsylvania camp, alleging that proper training and planning would have kept the boys in the shelter of the dining hall longer, preventing Matthew's death. They're not alone in criticizing the Scouts on lightning safety. Several prominent experts share such concerns.

"If it's going to take the Boy Scouts getting hit in the pocket to protect anyone else's family, then that's what I guess it takes," said Mary Tresca, sitting with her husband in their suburban New Jersey home.

The Boy Scouts deny negligence. Scout leaders have blamed Matthew's death on a "rogue lightning bolt" coming from skies that appeared to be clearing. National Scout officials say they strive to provide sound safety information to local Scout councils and trust council staff to make good use of it.

Since 1995, however, Associated Press and newspaper archives show that seven Scouts and Scout leaders have been killed and about 50 injured in 15 lightning incidents at Scout camps or on expeditions. National Scout officials testifying in sworn depositions for the Tresca case said they were unaware of several of the incidents, including a Scout leader's death at a camp near Pittsburgh in 2001.

Half a dozen of the country's foremost lightning-safety experts and advocates said in interviews that the organization -- which sends about 1 million boys into the outdoors each summer -- should be doing more in terms of training and vigilance.

"I was an Eagle Scout. I love the Boy Scouts," said Air Force meteorologist William Roeder. "But on this one they're wrong."

Roeder, who has provided weather advice to the space program at Cape Canaveral, said he offered to help the Scouts update their lightning-safety policies but was rebuffed.

"They have their heads in the sand," said Dr. Mary Ann Cooper of the University of Illinois at Chicago, a leading expert on lightning injuries. "Just about everybody else has come around on lightning safety -- golfers, boaters, park managers. The Boy Scouts are the one holdout."

Experts say some lightning casualties are inevitable when an organization sends so many young people into the wilderness. But Ronald Holle, an Arizona lightning expert, thinks some of the deaths -- including Matthew's -- were preventable.

"This was not a 'rogue bolt of lightning,' " Holle wrote in a court brief submitted on behalf of the Trescas. "If only on the basis of hearing thunder and seeing the flashes during the day, trained people should have kept everyone in the dining hall."

The criticism falls into two main categories.

Experts say local Scout councils should be required to adopt detailed lightning-safety plans for their camps encompassing such matters as monitoring severe weather and planning where Scouts should seek shelter. They say that national Scout officials should ensure such plans are followed.

Experts also say lightning safety should be a mandatory and detailed component of Scout leaders' training. They want leaders taught the rule of waiting 30 minutes after a storm's last visible bolt before resuming outdoor activities. They also want to spread the word that only substantial buildings and metal-enclosed motor vehicles -- not tents -- provide safe shelter from lightning. Some experts suggest the Scouts could offer a merit badge in lightning safety, thus creating a larger corps of adult leaders versed in the topic.

The Boy Scouts, offered an opportunity to respond in detail to the criticisms and suggestions, issued a statement.

"Lightning-safety education is an important part of our comprehensive safety program. It is taught to Scouts and Scout leaders at every level, at our schools and in the field," the Boy Scouts of America said. "Of course, Scouting is always alert to ways to improve its safety regime. However, no other youth organization spends as much effort on lightning safety and education as the Boy Scouts of America."

More on the Scouts' thinking about lightning safety is laid out in depositions obtained over the last two years by the Trescas' lawyer.

Los Angeles Times Articles