Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

The Nation

Hastert Stands Firm Against Office Search

The House speaker may fight a ruling favoring the FBI's Capitol seizure of a Democrat's files.

July 24, 2006|From the Associated Press

WASHINGTON — House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert said Sunday he might challenge a judge's order allowing FBI agents to examine documents seized at a Louisiana congressman's Capitol Hill office in a bribery probe.

He said he believed that Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.) was "in big trouble" and that the House would not be joining in support of him. But, he said, the House separately might seek to make clear its position that the Justice Department cannot randomly and wantonly search lawmakers' offices.

"There has to be a procedure for the Justice Department to come in and start just searching any congressman's office," Hastert (R-Ill.) said on "Fox News Sunday." "There is a constitutional division there that we have to protect."

Last week, Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan denied Jefferson's request to delay the investigation while the congressman appeals the judge's earlier ruling that the May office search was legal.

As a result of Hogan's ruling, Jefferson is seeking to bar a "filter team" of FBI agents from reviewing the seized documents pending an appeal. The filter team, which is unconnected to the prosecution team, would review records to determine whether they were among the items listed in a court warrant authorizing the search.

Investigators have been looking into whether the congressman promoted the sale of telecommunications equipment and services in exchange for stock and cash. Jefferson has not been charged and has denied wrongdoing.

Hastert said that FBI agents should be able to search for documents on any criminal aspect, but that they did not have a right to "take all your records," such as confidential tax forms.

Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales has directed that any review of the documents by the filter team not begin until Thursday to give judges time to consider Jefferson's call for a delay.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|