Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsChildren

Secondhand Smoke: It's All Bad

The surgeon general says findings are `indisputable': No level of exposure is safe, and the children of smokers are especially at risk.

June 28, 2006|Thomas H. Maugh II and Erin Cline, Times Staff Writers

Twenty years after the first surgeon general's report on secondhand smoke, the evidence is now "indisputable" that the noxious fumes are a major health threat that kills an estimated 50,000 people each year, a new federal study said Tuesday.

There is no level of exposure to smoke that is safe, and the children of smokers are at special risk, Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona said in releasing the new report.

Advertisement

"I am here to say the debate is over, the science is clear," Carmona said during a televised news conference from Washington. "Secondhand smoke is not a mere annoyance. It is a serious health hazard."

Studies in the two decades since the first federal report confirm that secondhand smoke is linked not only to heart disease and lung cancer, but also to breast cancer, childhood cancer, nasal sinus cancer, ear infections and asthma. Recent results have also shown a clear link to sudden infant death syndrome.

The only way to combat the health threat, he said, was to follow the lead of California and 15 other states and ban all smoking in public buildings.

The report estimated that about 30% of indoor workers are not protected by smoke-free laws.

Carmona said parents should protect the health of their children by stepping outside their homes before lighting up.

"So many children are exposed in the home," said Thomas Glynn of the American Cancer Society. "If we do nothing else, we need to protect children because they are more vulnerable and the effects are lifetime effects."

For everyone else, Carmona said, the best advice is simply "stay away from smokers."

Among the report's major conclusions:

* Exposure of nonsmokers to tobacco smoke increases their risk of both heart disease and cancer by as much as 30%.

* Even a brief exposure to tobacco smoke can increase risk, especially for people with heart and respiratory diseases.

* Segregating smokers is not an effective technique for preventing exposure of nonsmokers, and even the best available technology does not cleanse the air adequately.

* There is no evidence that smoke-free laws have significantly reduced sales at bars and restaurants.

The number of smokers in the U.S. has declined sharply since the 1964 surgeon general's report linking smoking to health problems.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|