Going with the flow
AFTER A BIG WINTER storm, I always like to check out a little something I call the "we're all gonna die" risk level.
It's measured by the depth of the Sierra Nevada snowpack, the source of most California drinking water. As the snowpack goes, so goes the state. And with global warming what it is, it should be pretty well gone by the next century.
I called the state water resources people in Sacramento. The guy who took my message said he'd just been snowboarding over the weekend and the snowpack looked excellent.
Wouldn't it be great, I said, if Californians kept an eye on the snowpack the way they do "American Idol," and he said that'd make him very happy indeed.
Later, I got a less colorful but more precise assessment from Frank Gehrke, snow surveys chief, who said that with the snowpack at above-average depth, it looks like a "very good March so far."
Could I stop fretting now? No. When the snowpack is shallow, I worry. But when it's deep, I worry more, because it's just like us to get all cocky and go off on an H20 binge and drink and shower and flush ourselves dry. The truth is, we're using it up -- or dirtying it up -- at a fast clip, but like real estate, they're not making it anymore.
Why are we so cavalier about the water supply? Why do we believe the scientists -- or the snowpack -- will invariably bail us out? It's what comes of seeing too many TV shows in which disaster is always averted between the last commercial break and the previews of next week's episode.
The story on Page 1 says NASA may have found geysers on a moon of Saturn, and immediately it's: Oh, there's a space volcano spurting ice like a chocolate fountain at an Oscar party. Cool. Maybe Halliburton can go bring it back. Think I'll go hose down the driveway to celebrate.
You won't think the gas crisis is so bad once the water crisis kicks in. How about a "Mad Max" remake, with Mel Gibson hunting down a liter of Fiji water instead of a liter of unleaded?
That big bond measure Arnold Schwarzenegger wants so he can brag about being the infrastructure governor -- if you don't see it on the ballot in June, it may be because of water. It can't get on the ballot unless the governor and two-thirds of the Legislature are onboard. But Republicans and Democrats in the Legislature are fighting over in-ground pools versus above-ground pools. No kidding. The GOP wants dams and reservoirs, and the Democrats want underground water storage.
