WASHINGTON — In explaining how he responded to early warnings of possible sexual misconduct by Rep. Mark Foley, House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert has suggested that the "over-friendly" e-mails Foley sent to a former page were not explicit enough to alert him to the seriousness of the problem.
But the e-mails were classic examples of the tactics predatory adults use to approach young people and called for close and immediate examination, psychiatrists and other clinical experts on sexual misconduct said Wednesday.
"They do in fact raise a red flag," said Dr. Paul Appelbaum, an expert on psychiatry, law and ethics at Columbia University.
The experts said that congressional leaders' response to the problem -- talking to Foley and telling him to stop -- seldom work in such cases.
"Just saying 'don't do that' isn't really enough," said Dr. Steven S. Sharfstein, a Baltimore psychiatrist and former president of the American Psychiatric Assn. "You can't just turn your back on it -- you have to open up that can of worms. There may be something there or there may not be, but you have to open it up."
Instead of investigating, senior officials of the House confronted Foley in private and demanded that he break off communication with the teenage boy, a former page from Louisiana.
Sexually explicit instant messages surfaced only recently.
Foley, a Florida Republican, resigned his seat Friday. He said he had entered a treatment program for alcoholism and other behavior problems.
Through his lawyer, Foley acknowledged Tuesday that he was gay, but he denied ever having had sexual contact with a minor. He also said through the attorney that he had been molested by a clergyman while a teenager.
In the e-mails from 2005 that were first brought to the GOP leadership's attention, Foley asked the former page what he would like for his birthday and requested a picture of him. Appelbaum said such questions could be interpreted as "grooming," a behavior pattern in which an adult sexually interested in a minor first tries to establish a relationship.
"They represent the kind of preliminary grooming that sexual predators often engage in before approaching a victim more directly for a sexual relationship, and hence should have been a warning," Appelbaum said.
"Taken as a whole, [the e-mails] show an adult man of prominent position evidencing a peculiarly personal interest in a boy about whom he knows very little. Taken together, they suggest someone who is trying to establish a personal relationship that ought to at least raise some questions," he said.
