Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsKim Jong Il

Talk tough, or just talk, to N. Korea

October 12, 2006

Re "Will North Korea play by the nuclear club's rules?" Opinion, Oct. 10

Jon B. Wolfsthal's suggestions are largely cogent and sensible, but saying that we might have a nuclear response to any missile test is the sort of thing that Kim Jong Il routinely challenges or ignores. What we need to say is that we will respond to any missile fired outside of North Korea's borders as a nuclear threat, whether announced as a test or not, whether over friendly territory or not, and respond accordingly, leaving the nature of the response open. That could range from shooting the missile down (if possible) to attacking the launch site even before the missile's nature and range were known.

GENE ROCHLIN

Berkeley

*

Wolfsthal's Op-Ed article is a good example of the old, tired thinking about dealing with North Korea. An examination of the steps leading to Pyongyang's detonating a nuclear device will show America's intractability in dealing with what President Bush has named an "axis of evil." As rhetoric, it has pleased the hawks, but it simply shows how little Bush and his team understand North Korea.

To defuse tensions on a divided Korean peninsula -- and with Pyongyang's entrance into the nuclear club, which is having an unsettling effect among its neighbors -- it is time to talk with Kim Jong Il, not isolate him more, as Wolfsthal suggests.

A slim opportunity exists, and it goes beyond the six-power talks. It is taking a chance for the advancement of a solution to current and long-standing problems with North Korea by reconvening the Geneva talks of 1954. By doing that, there is enough flexibility for two-, four- or six-power talks and for concluding, once and for all, a peace treaty with North Korea, thereby ending de jure the Korean War of more than half a century ago.

ROBERT CAMBRIA

New York

The writer is a former managing editor of the Korean Review.

*

For more than five years the Bush administration has manipulated, to its political advantage, the line "the world changed on 9/11." Gee, I wonder why then, a day after North Korea went nuclear, the administration has shriveled away from the other reality, the other high-impact line: "The world changed on 10/9."

PHILIP HU

Alhambra

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|