Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsTrials

Agents Get Prison for Wounding a Smuggler

The border officers were doing their job, backers say. The two had tried to cover up the shooting.

October 20, 2006|Miguel Bustillo | Times Staff Writer

EL PASO, Texas — Two U.S. Border Patrol agents were watching the Mexican boundary last year when they stopped a van carrying 743 pounds of marijuana. The driver fled back across the Rio Grande -- with a gunshot wound in his buttocks.

Federal prosecutors convinced a jury in March that the agents had shot a defenseless man and schemed to cover it up. Much of the evidence against them came from the drug runner, Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila, who reported the shooting to a friend at the Border Patrol in Arizona. Aldrete-Davila was given immunity from prosecution by the U.S. attorney's office.

On Thursday, the agents -- Ignacio "Nacho" Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean -- were sentenced to 11 years and 12 years, respectively, for offenses that included violating the smuggler's civil rights. Outraged supporters and anguished family members packed the courtroom, and many wept as the sentences were announced.

Outside the courthouse, members of the Minuteman Project, a group that opposes illegal immigration, carried "Free Nacho" placards. "I'm just happy to be going home to my family tonight," Ramos said as he left the courtroom, surrounded by his attorneys and relatives. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Cardone agreed to let the men remain free until January, when they must report to prison.

The case has become a cause celebre among activists against illegal immigration and advocates of stronger border security, who say it epitomizes misplaced priorities of federal prosecutors as well as the predicament of Border Patrol agents, who must fight heavily armed criminals with little or no force. Among the rules broken by the agents, supporters note, was a policy forbidding agents from chasing suspected drug smugglers without permission from supervisors.

After Ramos and Compean were convicted, members of Congress demanded a review of the case; tens of thousands of people signed a petition supporting the agents and the efforts of the Border Patrol, which is vastly outgunned in its battle against narcotics cartels and human smuggling rings.

But Walter Boyaki, an attorney representing the smuggler, commended federal prosecutors for having the courage to carry on with a politically unpopular case, and argued that if the agents had not been punished, it would have "put a bull's-eye on every illegal alien."

The agents were convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon and defacing a crime scene as well as violating Aldrete-Davila's rights. One of the charges against both agents, using a firearm in the commission of a felony, carried a mandatory 10-year term. Although only one shot struck Aldrete-Davila, both agents fired. Lawyers for the agents successfully sought reduced sentences for the other counts, arguing that the men had solid records before the shooting. Cardone gave Compean a longer sentence because she found him more culpable. She did not explain why.

"He's a good man who did his job," said Compean's attorney, Chris Antcliff. "What's got people so upset is the draconian punishment in this case."

Added Andy Ramirez, head of Friends of the Border Patrol, a California group that has rallied support for the agents: "Why are they trying to protect this dope smuggler so badly? Why are they ruining the lives of two agents for doing their job?"

Federal prosecutors say the facts -- including evidence that Ramos and Compean did not report the Feb. 17, 2005, shooting near Fabens, Texas, to their superiors -- clearly warranted a tough prosecution. They say illegal-immigration opponents have spread lies and half-truths in a calculated campaign to turn the agents into martyrs.

"Federal agents do not get to shoot unarmed people as they are running away in the back and then lie about it and cover it up," said Johnny Sutton, U.S. attorney for Texas' Western District. "It is very important for border agents to follow the laws they enforce, and in those rare instances where they do not do that, it is our job to bring them to justice."

Ramos and Compean said they had scuffled with Aldrete-Davila and he appeared to be holding a gun. Aldrete-Davila said he was unarmed and had held up his hands in surrender; he said he fled only after Compean tried to beat him with the end of his shotgun.

As he ran toward the Rio Grande, Aldrete-Davila said, he felt a sharp sting and fell. When he touched his backside, he said, his hand came away bloody, and he limped back to Mexico. Ballistics experts matched the bullet extracted from Aldrete-Davila's buttocks to Ramos' handgun.

He has sued the federal government for $5 million, claiming he was permanently injured.

The agents' description about what had occurred was contradicted by other agents who arrived on the scene. One testified that Compean had admitted to picking up shotgun casings to cover up the fact that he fired at the smuggler.

After the trial, three jurors gave sworn statements that they felt pressure to convict, not understanding a hung jury was possible. Attorneys for the agents sought a new trial before the sentencing, but their request was denied. They plan to appeal.

miguel.bustillo@latimes.com

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|