YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

The Nation

Bush Politicized a Solemn Day, Democrats Say

A dispute erupts over his prime-time 9/11 speech, which officials said would be free of politics.

September 13, 2006|Peter Wallsten | Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — As White House officials sought approval from television executives for a coveted prime-time broadcast of President Bush's Oval Office address commemorating the fifth anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, they said publicly that the speech would steer clear of politics.

As late as Sunday, as Bush prepared for a raft of Sept. 11 ceremonies, White House Press Secretary Tony Snow told reporters that the address was "not going to be a political speech -- there are no calls to action, there are no attempts to segregate Democrats from Republicans."

But Bush's inclusion in his remarks Monday night of a stout defense of his policies in Iraq -- as well as his suggestion that a united front was needed on the subject -- sent Democrats scrambling to issue late-night responses and prompted at least one network to adjust its programming to make time for political analysis. And the controversy continued Tuesday, as debate flared over whether Bush inappropriately politicized a day set aside for memorials and solemn reflection.

The dispute comes eight weeks before voters are to decide which party will control Congress for Bush's final two years in office, and underscores how each side is vying to make the issue of national security work to its advantage.

Bush, in a series of recent appearances, and other administration officials have stressed their view that the increasingly unpopular war in Iraq was part of the broader fight against terrorism and that critics were playing into the hands of terrorists.

Democrats have argued that the war has weakened the United States' standing in the world and that Bush's "stay the course" policy only increases the terrorism threat.

The rhetoric escalated after Bush's speech Monday night.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) accused Republicans of employing "cynical tactics" to scare voters, while House Majority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) wondered aloud whether Democrats were "more interested in protecting the terrorists than protecting the American people."

Democrats pressed their case that the White House had misrepresented the tenor of Bush's speech, causing the broadcast networks to give him a prime-time slot without setting time aside for an opposition response or interviews with Democrats.

"The American people, us included, took [White House officials] at their word when they said it would not be a political speech," said Bill Burton, a spokesman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) sent letters to network news executives Tuesday asking for more coverage of Democrats' views as part of reporting on Bush's war-related speeches.

Bush mused Tuesday about the dispute over his speech, telling a group of conservative columnists during an Oval Office interview that he would have been attacked either way.

"Imagine what they would have said if I hadn't talked about Iraq -- 'Failed policy, won't talk about it,' " he said, according to an account posted on the National Review Online.

The first indication that Monday night's address might go beyond a Sept. 11 commemoration came about three hours before Bush delivered it, when the White House press office distributed advance excerpts. It included one line declaring that winning the war on terrorism "will require the determined efforts of a unified country," and that Americans "must put aside our differences, and work together to meet the test that history has given us."

Still, the excerpts contained no mentions of Iraq -- and the headline on the news release alerted reporters only that Bush's speech would "remember those who lost their lives five years ago today and pay tribute to the heroes whose acts of courage that day saved so many lives," and reflect on "what Sept. 11 has meant to America and how we can move forward together to win the war on terror."

On NBC, which like the other two major networks interrupted regular programming to televise Bush's remarks, Washington bureau chief Tim Russert told viewers before the speech that the president would be assuming the role of "commander in chief, healer in chief, comforter in chief; all alone in the Oval Office with one big megaphone for the country and the world to hear."

But Bush wasted little time in his 17-minute address before reverting to the oft-repeated lines of his election-year speeches defending the invasion of Iraq.

"I'm often asked why we're in Iraq when Saddam Hussein was not responsible for the 9/11 attacks," he said. "The answer is that the regime of Saddam Hussein was a clear threat.... The world is safer because Saddam Hussein is no longer in power."

Bush went on to quote Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden predicting that defeat in Iraq would mean America's "defeat and disgrace forever," a line the president has often used to criticize Democrats who have endorsed a timetable for withdrawing troops.

Los Angeles Times Articles