Advertisement

In a switch, charters near Locke approved

The L.A. school board overturns an earlier vote and allows Green Dot to open new campuses.

April 11, 2007|Joel Rubin, Times Staff Writer

After rejecting plans last month by a leading charter organization to reform one of the city's worst high schools, a bitterly divided Los Angeles Board of Education reversed itself Tuesday at a chaotic and heated meeting.

Board member Jon Lauritzen had joined two other board members to vote down a proposal by Green Dot Public Schools to open several new charter campuses near Locke High in South Los Angeles. On Tuesday, Lauritzen called for a reconsideration of that vote and succeeded in overturning that controversial -- and potentially illegal -- decision.


Advertisement

The March 29 rejection of Green Dot was widely thought to have violated state laws that spell out when a board can deny a charter application. In the days after the vote, Lauritzen, who is locked in a close run-off election race, and the other board members who opposed the idea, came under intense criticism by many who said they were obstructing reform at one of the district's schools that need it most.

Lauritzen did an about-face of sorts Tuesday evening at a special meeting called to reconsider the Green Dot vote.

The board approved a resolution proposed by Lauritzen that grants Green Dot permission to open its schools in the fall of 2008, a year later than Green Dot had sought.

The resolution also calls on district Supt. David Brewer to develop a broader, but still largely undefined, partnership with charter schools and the influential teachers union to reform the many struggling middle and high schools in the Los Angeles Unified School District.

Before the 4-2 vote, the meeting devolved into near chaos, as board member Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte challenged the board's procedure for reconsidering the vote. Board President Marlene Canter struggled to maintain control of the meeting as LaMotte repeatedly and loudly interrupted her.

"The longer you keep on talking, the more foolish you are going to make us look!" an exasperated Canter told LaMotte.

"Well, I am going to look really stupid voting for this when it is something that it does not purport to be!" LaMotte shot back.

Three board members joined Lauritzen in voting for the motion. LaMotte and Julie Korenstein, who voted against the charters last week, remained opposed. The board's seventh member, David Tokofsky, recused himself because he works for Green Dot.

Charters are publicly funded, independently run schools that, in exchange for increasing student performance, are allowed to develop their own curricula and are free from many of the other restrictions imposed on traditional schools.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|