Advertisement

State takes closer look at district

Val Verde Unified raised funds for modern facilities but may have violated state rules. At risk is $90 million in future funds.

April 26, 2007|Maeve Reston, Times Staff Writer

SACRAMENTO — Several members of the state panel that oversees funding for new schools said Wednesday that they wanted a full review to determine if Riverside County's Val Verde Unified School District misspent state funds.

One member also expressed concern that the district's growing debt may put it in financial peril.


Advertisement

"I think we have a train wreck coming financially," said State Allocation Board member Sen. Bob Margett (R-Arcadia). "From the information that I have, they just -- financially -- are over their heads."

State officials are looking into whether the district should be docked as much as $90 million on future construction projects.

At issue is the millions of dollars in school construction bonds Val Verde issued while it received hundreds of millions of dollars in special state assistance to districts in financial hardship.

Since 1999, the Val Verde district has qualified as a "hardship" school district, meaning that it has declared it does not have the revenue or debt capacity to pay 50% of new school planning and construction costs. As a result, the state has paid 100% of the cost of building most of the district's new schools.

The state board took no action Wednesday but plans to call district officials to its May meeting for a more thorough review of the district's finances.

Val Verde Supt. C. Fred Workman said this week that concerns about the district's spending and financial situation were unwarranted and that the district was nowhere near bankruptcy. The school district includes Perris, Moreno Valley and Mead Valley.

On Wednesday, board Chairwoman Anne Sheehan said it was unfair to try a school district in the "court of public opinion." She and several other members complained that a draft report prepared by state school construction officials that was critical of Val Verde's spending practices had been disclosed to the media.

In the widely distributed draft report, which was obtained by The Times, officials at the Office of Public School Construction blamed cost overruns at some district schools on nonessential perks, including a 5,000-square-foot weight room at a high school, state-of-the-art stadiums, elaborate locker rooms and larger schools than required. Val Verde officials have said that the expenses questioned were essential to give their students the same advantages as the students in wealthier districts.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|