Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsHealth

On the big screen . . .

In 'Diving Bell,' a magazine editor survives a stroke but finds himself immobilized.

Medicine / THE UNREAL WORLD

December 17, 2007|Marc Siegel, Special to The Times

"The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" ("Le Scaphandre et le papillon"), in French with English subtitles; directed by Julian Schnabel; U.S. limited release date Nov. 30; based on a true story.

The Premise: Jean-Dominique Bauby (Mathieu Amalric), an editor for Elle magazine, is driving along a country road in France when he begins to lose control of his car and then his body, speaking non sequiturs and becoming rapidly paralyzed. He awakes in a hospital near Normandy, having had a stroke. Now suffering from "locked-in syndrome," he is only able to blink his left eye, with limited movements of his mouth and head (trapped as in a diving bell). Bauby reflects (his thoughts portrayed as narration): "Other than my eye, two things aren't paralyzed -- my imagination and my memory." With the help of a speech therapist, Henriette (Marie-Josee Croze), he learns to communicate by blinking his eye in response to the intended letters of the alphabet. Eventually he dictates an entire memoir about his life and his illness.


Advertisement

Meanwhile, physical therapists massage and manipulate his body, trying vainly to restore swallowing or sustained movement. His mouth is permanently turned to the left side; he can open it but is barely able to move his tongue. He moves his head once after his accident but not again. He is fed through a tube and breathes through another one inserted in his neck. Bauby ultimately develops pneumonia and dies a few days after his book is published.

The medical questions: What causes "locked-in syndrome" and how accurately is it portrayed? Can the condition be rehabilitated to any meaningful extent? Are patients at significant risk for medical complications? Can the damage of a stroke like this be reversed?

The reality: Locked-in syndrome refers to a condition in which a patient is motionless and mute but remains alert and aware of all sensation.

The film shows this condition fairly accurately -- the preservation of blinking is characteristic of this condition -- though the deficits are generally on both sides of the face. Variations are possible, but movements of the mouth or head would be rare and, frequently, blinking or vertical movements of the eyes are all people can do. Patients can generally breathe on their own but cannot swallow, so the movie's depiction of Bauby -- receiving feedings by tube but not hooked to a respirator -- is also accurate.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|