Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsFinances

2008 SPENDING PROPOSAL: ENERGY, CALIFORNIA

Bottom line for Bush's '08 budget: contention

Democrats find a lot to dislike about tax policy, Pentagon spending and cuts in Medicare.

February 06, 2007|Joel Havemann and Maura Reynolds | Times Staff Writers

WASHINGTON — The $2.9-trillion budget President Bush unveiled Monday highlighted major policy differences with the Democrats in control of Capitol Hill and set the stage for vigorous battles over healthcare, war costs and deficit reduction in the last two years of his presidency.

Although presidents' budgets have always been largely a theoretical exercise -- the Constitution gives Congress the job of passing spending bills -- they help set the terms of Washington's heated budget debates. The heat flared up immediately Monday as Republicans lined up squarely behind Bush's budget for fiscal 2008, while Democrats castigated it as both heartless and fiscally irresponsible.

The sharp divide seemed to shatter the spirit of bipartisanship that both parties had cultivated since the Democrats captured control of Congress in November's elections.

Democrats complained that they saw no evidence of declining war costs, and they railed against Bush's single biggest spending constraint: holding down the growth of Medicare.

"This budget represents more of the same wrong priorities: placing a higher priority on huge tax cuts for multimillionaires than on urgent national needs," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco). "Democrats are prepared to work with Republicans to make the tough choices that will return our budgets to fiscal responsibility, but today's budget from the president is simply not the right approach."

The coming face-off over outlays for the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, social programs and tax cuts will offer a preview to the debates likely to dominate the 2008 elections.

Bush, in his written budget message to Congress, challenged lawmakers to balance the budget by 2012, as his plan would, without raising taxes.

"My formula for a balanced budget," he said, "reflects the priorities of our country at this moment in its history: protecting the homeland and fighting terrorism, keeping the economy strong with low taxes and keeping spending under control while making federal programs more effective."

Bush's plan to balance the budget in five years echoed the plan advanced last year by congressional Democrats during Congress' attempt to write its own budget for 2007. The Democrats' plan died when Congress was unable to agree on either party's budget.

Bush proposed that the government spend $2.9 trillion next year -- that's $5.5 million a minute -- on revenues of $2.7 trillion.

Revenues would overtake spending five years from now, according to Bush's calculations, with spending of $3.2 trillion and revenue of $3.3 trillion.

The president's plan would balance the budget mostly through spending cuts rather than tax increases.

"Balancing the budget by raising taxes would put our economy at risk," Rob Portman, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, told reporters.

Bush's across-the-board tax cuts, enacted in 2001 and 2003 to expire at the end of 2010, would be made permanent. The expiration date had been a way to reduce the theoretical price tag.

The alternative minimum tax, designed four decades ago to prevent the very wealthy from sheltering most of their income from taxes, would be repealed before inflation could drive more middle-class and upper-middle-class taxpayers into its clutches. The revenue loss would be offset after next year by unspecified increases elsewhere in the tax code.

"We want to work with Congress to reform the [alternative minimum tax] because we believe it is a misguided tax policy," Portman said.

The president's proposals also include stepped-up tax enforcement, acceding to complaints that nearly $300 billion in revenue is not collected each year.

Treasury officials suggested in a briefing Monday several ways to improve tax collection, including increasing the enforcement budget for the Internal Revenue Service and passing new provisions to help the government keep tabs on taxpayers' income. One proposal, they said, would make it easier to calculate capital gains taxes for stock transactions: Investment houses would have to report how much money a stockholder originally paid for a stock, not just how much he received when he sold it. The provision would take effect for stocks purchased after 2008, the officials said.

On the spending side, the administration proposed defense outlays of historic proportions, asking for more than $623 billion for the Pentagon in the budget for the 2008 fiscal year, which runs from October 2007 to the end of September 2008. And for the first time since fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq began, the administration's request included an estimate for the cost of the wars, which totaled $142 billion on top of the Defense Department's normal budget of $481 billion.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|