YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Probe of Broadcom options may scrutinize company founders

The two Orange County billionaires administered most of the questionable grants at the chip maker, regulatory filings show.

January 18, 2007|E. Scott Reckard | Times Staff Writer

As federal investigators ramp up their examination of stock option practices at Broadcom Corp., they are likely to put a spotlight on Henry T. Nicholas III and Henry Samueli, the billionaire founders of the Irvine chip maker, legal experts say.

Broadcom disclosed last month that the Securities and Exchange Commission had elevated its inquiry to a formal investigation, an action that gives the agency the power to subpoena documents and testimony. The U.S. attorney's office, which could pursue criminal prosecutions, also is reviewing documents related to Broadcom's stock options, the company has said.

Nicholas and Samueli, who rank among Southern California's leading philanthropists, served as a two-member committee that administered most of the questionable stock option grants from 1998 through early 2003, regulatory filings show.

That period is now at the center of the federal investigations, and it's almost certain that authorities will want to question both men, said Jan Handzlik, a former federal prosecutor who is in private practice at Howrey Simon Arnold & White.

"Among the key people you would have to interview would be the members of the options committee," Handzlik said.

Neither Samueli nor Nicholas was among those who received stock options improperly, boosting their value to recipients, Broadcom said in a Dec. 18 statement on its internal investigation of the case, which was conducted by an outside law firm.

Broadcom said it found no wrongdoing on the part of Samueli, the company chairman, saying he "reasonably relied upon management and professionals regarding the correct option accounting treatment and grant approval process."

Those "actively responsible for the selection of [the] option grant dates" at issue, the company said, had left the company for unrelated reasons or as a result of the company's options investigation.

The company's statement was silent on Nicholas, who left Broadcom in January 2003 but remains a major shareholder. Executives declined to comment beyond their public statements to the SEC.

By exonerating Samueli and not Nicholas, Broadcom could be seen as making "an implicit statement" that it believes Nicholas might share blame for the problems, said John C. Coffee, a securities law professor at Columbia University.

"You've got two people on that committee. If you clear one and not the other, it's a negative pregnant. You're saying that we're not exonerating the other," Coffee said.

Nicholas' attorney, Gregory Weingart of Munger, Tolles & Olson, declined to comment. Weingart is the former head fraud prosecutor for the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles.

Samueli's attorney, Gordon Greenberg of McDermott Will & Emery, said it was reasonable to expect that the government will want to question the duo about the option grants. He declined to comment further.

Broadcom has linked only one former employee to the scandal by name: William J. Ruehle, the former chief financial officer. In September, the company said Ruehle was retiring early "as a result of Broadcom's previously announced equity award review."

Last month, Broadcom canceled stock options it had granted to Ruehle worth $32.8 million but credited him the same amount as an offset against possible judgments in lawsuits accusing him of violating his duties as a Broadcom officer. Ruehle's attorney, Robert Feldman of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, declined to comment.

Stock options are rights to buy shares at a set price in the future. Broadcom, which makes microchips used in cable modems and other communications technology, is among nearly 200 companies that have disclosed internal or federal investigations into whether executives improperly looked back to pick grant dates when the stock price was low, thus making the options more valuable.

The probes have led to at least $7.9 billion in earnings restatements and charges to reflect costs that should have been recorded. Broadcom has said it will reduce its past earnings by more than $1.5 billion, the largest amount among the companies involved.

Coffee said the SEC's declaration of a formal investigation, which requires approval of the five-member commission, indicated that the Broadcom case was serious and possibly one in which the agency needed a subpoena to get access to crucial documents.

In addition to seeking to interview the founders and others involved in the options grants, Coffee said, federal investigators will be looking for any falsification of related documents.

Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles, declined to comment, as did SEC officials.

Broadcom became a public company in 1998 and gained fame for lavishly rewarding employees with stock options, which generated fortunes during the stock boom of the late 1990s. Nicholas and Samueli emerged as prominent philanthropists and joined elite social circles.

Los Angeles Times Articles