Advertisement
 

NIH takes on a hefty lease for shaky facility

The Nation

Researchers object to the $330-million deal because the building's vibrations could ruin sensitive experiments.

January 24, 2007|Walter F. Roche Jr. | Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — A federal agency has committed itself to a $330-million long-term lease for a new bioresearch building in Baltimore, but its occupancy is stalled while officials grapple with an issue that first surfaced before construction even began.

The 10-story building vibrates, particularly in its upper floors. Now, as engineers try once again to sort out the problem, questions remain about whether highly sensitive scientific research can ever be performed in the structure.

A Times review of the project from its early planning stages shows that at virtually every step in the process, federal officials ignored expert advice about the building's structural design. Officials also pushed to lease space for the National Institute on Aging laboratories despite a government agency's opinion that it would cost too much.

Dr. Elias A. Zerhouni, who oversees the institute as director of the National Institutes of Health, recently promised that regardless of ongoing testing, his agency would eventually fully occupy the new quarters. The $250-million building is owned by an affiliate of Johns Hopkins University, where Zerhouni spent much of his career before joining the NIH in 2002. He was an executive vice dean of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine when the building's lease was authorized by Congress.

Zerhouni insists that the NIH intends to honor the lease, citing recent data "that the facility will be capable of accommodating state-of-the-art biomedical research." Even so, he said that some labs may be left at a nearby federally owned building.

Several hundred scientists and laboratory workers were supposed to move into the new building late last year. NIH officials hope that engineering studies conducted in coming weeks will allow the move to proceed by summer.

The selection of Baltimore as the new laboratory site was viewed as an important achievement by local and university officials, who envisioned the facility as a major new element in a growing bioresearch sector and a source of jobs in the city's blue-collar Highlandtown neighborhood.

Records obtained by The Times show that some NIH scientists are concerned that the vibration issue is more serious than Zerhouni has acknowledged. In a Feb. 21 e-mail to NIH officials, a California consultant hired to examine the issue concluded that the building's floors were not stiff enough, causing vibrations that would interfere with basic research equipment.

Floor stiffness was a key topic at a March 13 meeting among NIH scientists, engineers and outside consultants. Some researchers warned that vibrations caused by people simply walking down corridors or within laboratories could disrupt ongoing projects. The researchers discussed establishing walking speed limits to minimize shaking.

Several at the meeting noted that some earlier landmark projects -- such as research that led to development of medicated stents for heart patients -- could not have been conducted in a vibrating building.

"At this point," one researcher stated, "you just can't place tissue culture anywhere" in the new building.

"You are correct," an NIH official and a consultant responded, according to the minutes.

At another meeting March 17, the institute on aging's scientific director, Dan Longo, said, "If we spend a lot of money in fixing the floors, it doesn't necessarily solve the problem."

Another scientist at the institute said, "It's a no-brainer to me that our research will be severely compromised," the minutes show.

Around that time, outside engineering expert Allyn Kilsheimer recommended attaching steel plates beneath the beams on each floor to reduce vibrations. That advice was not followed.

Hopkins efforts to land a major new federal research facility on its Bayview campus in East Baltimore date to the 1990s.

In 1999, NIH said it was considering a lease arrangement with Hopkins' real estate arm, the Dome Corp. The U.S. General Services Administration said it would be less expensive for the government to build its own structure.

Nevertheless, in late 2000 Congress approved a provision pushed by Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski, a Baltimore Democrat, authorizing NIH to enter into the lease. The facility would house the NIH's aging institute as well as the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The lease arrangement was unique for the NIH, which owns its other research facilities.

The NIH has agreed to pay the Hopkins affiliate $13.2 million a year for 20 years with a 3% annual adjustment -- a total of more than $330 million -- with an option for an additional 10 years. Exercise of the option would cost an extra $260 million. The fees include $400,000 in ground rent and $6.5 million for site improvements. The balance would go to pay off $200 million in bonds the Hopkins affiliate issued to finance the building.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|