Advertisement

The flaw in a spanking ban: Neighborhood watch

Dana Parsons ORANGE COUNTY

January 30, 2007|Dana Parsons

I'm going to give Viviane Oglevie all the space today, because I want her argument to be heard. I agree with just about all of it, yet I'll probably end up disappointing her in the end.

Maybe I'm on a guilt trip. Or not as evolved as I want to be.


Advertisement

Oglevie is a family therapist who is unequivocally against any form of spanking. As such, she supports a proposed bill by Bay Area Assemblywoman Sally Lieber that's still in its formative stages but which would make it illegal for parents to strike children younger than 4.

Oglevie would like that number stretched to 99, but for now she'll settle for Lieber's idea.

Oglevie and her husband are the parents of an 11-year-old girl. Oglevie has already had the mini-debates with other parents who say her child will turn out all wrong because she's never had a well-deserved spanking. To which Oglevie replies: So far, so good.

She favors an outright spanking ban because, she says, adults can't strike anyone else's child, so why should they be allowed to strike their own?

Society protects children from serious abuse that leaves obvious marks like bruises or scars, but why not against all forms of corporal punishment?

A punch to the face is worse than a swat on the bottom, but Oglevie argues that the "child abuse" definition that society generally embraces should be broadened.

The American Academy of Pediatrics, she says, includes less obvious actions like slapping or shoving, threats of violence or verbal put-downs or shaming as forms of abuse.

California law already requires that teachers, nurses and certain other groups report obvious signs of child abuse. But who will report the spanking that leaves no mark?

Oglevie would. She says she recently saw a man strike his son several times on the head and called him on it. He told her to mind her own business.

Of course, there's the rub. And which makes the issue a great one for public discussion.

Oglevie concedes that, for the most part, the enforcement in Lieber's bill would start with people reporting on their neighbors or friends. That's dicey, and I'm not convinced most people would do it.

Oglevie realizes that and sees the proposed bill as a step on a road toward a no-strike society. She says most serious child abuse starts out as "mild punishment" that can, if left unchecked, permit a parent to ratchet up the violence as he or she loses control.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|