YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

The Nation

One more Republican breaks rank

Sen. Pete V. Domenici says Bush's strategy in Iraq is not working and calls for one that will start withdrawal.

July 06, 2007|Noam N. Levey | Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — President Bush's Iraq strategy suffered a new Republican defection Thursday as New Mexico Sen. Pete V. Domenici said the president's approach was not working and called for a new one that would allow American troops to start leaving.

"I do not support an immediate withdrawal from Iraq or a reduction in funding for our troops," said Domenici, who has fervently opposed congressional efforts this year to force the administration to scale back the U.S. military presence in Iraq. "But I do support a new strategy that will move our troops out of combat operations and on the path to coming home."

Domenici's remarks drew a measured response from the White House, which has been trying to maintain Republican support for the president's 6-month-old strategy of using additional American forces, primarily in Baghdad, to control sectarian violence.

Bush has repeatedly argued that the stepped-up U.S. military role will allow the Iraqi government to take steps to reconcile the country's warring Shiite and Sunni Arab factions and stabilize the country.

"We respect Sen. Domenici. He is an important voice," White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said. "But we believe that the Baghdad security plan should be given an opportunity to be carried out."

Bush administration officials have said they might need many more months to assess whether the troop buildup was working.

The expressions of doubt from a loyal White House ally, however, will probably further undermine the Bush administration's ability to continue the current strategy much beyond this summer.

Last week, two other GOP lawmakers -- including Indiana Sen. Richard G. Lugar, the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee -- called Bush's strategy a failure and urged the president to begin planning a troop withdrawal.

As the Senate prepares for two weeks of debate about the Iraq war when it takes up the defense authorization bill, at least seven Republicans have openly called for the Bush administration to begin planning a troop withdrawal.

With the Senate's 49 Democrats nearly united, the chamber is inching toward the 60 votes needed to pass a bill to force the president to adopt a new strategy.

Domenici's comments also provided another indication of the political pressure on congressional Republicans to distance themselves from the unpopular president and the war.

Domenici, who was first elected to the Senate in 1972, has not been among the handful of Republican lawmakers expressing reservations about Bush's wartime leadership. In the last Congress, he voted with the White House 90% of the time, according to Congressional Quarterly.

Now the 75-year-old senator, who is up for his seventh term next year, is facing a summer campaign by antiwar organizations.

Domenici pointedly did not endorse any of the Democratic legislative initiatives to compel the president to begin withdrawing troops.

Instead, he said he would sign on to legislation being sponsored by a bipartisan group of 10 senators to make the recommendations of the Iraq Study Group the foundation of U.S. policy in Iraq.

Although the study group report did not set a timetable for withdrawing U.S. troops, it laid out a series of policies designed to allow U.S. combat forces to begin to pull out in March.

Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill are pushing a much more aggressive deadline that would force the president to complete a withdrawal of most forces by April 1. On Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) challenged Domenici to join them.

"Sen. Domenici is correct to assess that the administration's war strategy is misguided," Reid said in a statement.

"But we will not see a much-needed change of course in Iraq until Republicans ... are willing to stand up to President Bush and his stubborn clinging to a failed policy -- and more importantly, back up their words with action."


Los Angeles Times Articles