Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsDismissals

Miers holds firm on not testifying, lawyer says

July 18, 2007|From the Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Former White House Counsel Harriet E. Miers will continue to refuse to appear before a House committee, her lawyer said Tuesday, despite Democrats' threats to hold her in contempt.

"Ms. Miers will not appear before the committee or otherwise produce documents or provide testimony," lawyer George T. Manning said in a letter to the committee.

The House Judiciary Committee had given Miers, who defied a subpoena to appear before the committee, until Tuesday to change her mind about testifying. Lawmakers have been investigating whether the White House was involved in the dismissals of eight federal prosecutors.

"Her failure to comply with our subpoena is a serious affront to this committee and our constitutional system of checks and balances," House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) said. "We are carefully planning our next steps."

Any contempt proceedings would first be considered by the committee and later by the full House. If a majority of the House approves a contempt order, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) would refer the matter to the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Jeff Taylor, a President Bush appointee.

While Democrats say Miers made her own decision not to appear, Manning said in the letter that Bush told her to defy the committee because of executive privilege. Democrats say her immunity ended when she left her White House job.

The White House is also claiming executive privilege on e-mails about the firings sent by White House officials on Republican National Committee-sponsored accounts. Those documents also have been subpoenaed with a Tuesday return date, but Conyers agreed to give the RNC until July 31 to turn over the documents or explain why not.

A Judiciary subcommittee will meet on Thursday to consider the White House's executive privilege claim.

Bush and Atty. Gen. Alberto R. Gonzales have denied wrongdoing in the dismissal of the federal prosecutors, maintaining they are political appointees who can be fired by the president for almost any reason.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|