Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsAbortion

On abortion, many have flip-flopped

Romney is just the latest candidate to switch positions. It can work, depending on how voters gauge sincerity.

THE NATION

March 11, 2007|Janet Hook, Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — He is indisputably the most liberal Democrat running for president in 2008. He wants the U.S. out of Iraq -- and fast. He supports national health insurance. He's against the death penalty.

And Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich is for abortion rights. At least, now he is. As recently as five years ago, the Ohio Democrat was so far from liberal orthodoxy on abortion policy that he earned a 90% rating from the nation's leading anti-abortion advocacy group.


Advertisement

That journey underscores a rarely acknowledged fact about abortion, one of the most emotionally charged issues in American politics: Previous candidates for the nation's highest offices have switched sides on this issue too. Among them have been such heavyweights as Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Al Gore and Dick Gephardt.

This year, Republicans are trying to come to grips with the 180-degree turn on abortion executed by Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor who has become a top-tier presidential contender and the favorite of many GOP conservatives.

Romney until just a few years ago firmly supported abortion rights; he reversed field in 2004 and now calls himself "pro-life." That has spurred a pressing debate among conservative Republicans over whether they can trust him to be a true champion of the anti-abortion position.

As the history of abortion maneuvers shows, voters have come to accept some changes of heart as sincere and durable. Reagan, for example, eventually became a hero of anti-abortion activists even though, as California governor, he signed a law vastly expanding legal abortion.

But at other times, voters have viewed abortion converts -- whether they shifted to favor or oppose abortion rights -- as lacking commitment on a fundamental issue.

Gephardt abandoned a measure significantly restricting abortion, and that move endeared him to Democratic Party activists just before he ran for the 1988 presidential nomination. But the switch contributed to an unflattering view of him as a political opportunist without firm principles, which weakened him as a candidate.

A similar image dogged Gore's 2000 presidential campaign, as he had also switched from a conservative to a liberal position on abortion and other issues.

That is a cautionary tale for Romney. His abortion conversion faces especially deep skepticism because it is one of many issues -- including gay rights and gun control -- where he seems to have been inconsistent.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|