Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsIran

British caught in a painfully familiar scene

Iran also seized their servicemen in 2004, but a former naval official says this time may be more serious.

THE WORLD

March 25, 2007|Kim Murphy, Times Staff Writer

LONDON — A disconcerting sense of deja vu surrounds Iran's capture of 15 British sailors and marines on smuggling patrol Friday in the Persian Gulf.

Three years ago, eight British servicemen traveling in small boats up the Shatt al Arab waterway near the Iranian border with Iraq found themselves surrounded by members of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard, arrested and subjected to a three-day ordeal that included mock executions and a visit to what they thought would be their graves. After a few days, they were released.


Advertisement

The previous incident raises concerns here over what the captured sailors and marines may be going through, and has also raised questions about the rules of engagement that do not allow British military officers on smuggling patrol in the Persian Gulf to return fire when confronted, a former senior navy official said Saturday.

"I think if we're going to be operating in those waters and something like this happens, we have to think very carefully about, rather than being de-escalatory, stepping back and turning the other cheek, whether we should be responding in some different way," Alan West, who commanded the British navy during the June 2004 incident, said in a telephone interview.

"It's completely outrageous for any nation to go out and arrest the servicemen of another nation in waters that don't belong to them," he said.

In both cases, Iranian officials said that British servicemen were operating in Iranian waters -- a charge that Britain has strenuously denied.

The captives in 2004 appeared blindfolded on Iranian television and apologized for entering Iran's territory. "Our team of three boats and eight crew entered Iranian waters by mistake. We apologize because this was a big mistake," Sgt. Thomas Harkins said in the broadcast as carried on Iranian television and translated by British news agencies.

But West said the current capture seemed more serious than the 2004 incident, which he said appeared to be the result of a local Iranian commander who had "overreacted, and done something he shouldn't have done."

"Although they treated our people outrageously, blindfolding them, staging mock executions, making them think they were digging their own grave, in the end after about three days, they got to Tehran and let them go," he said.

In the present case, he said it was worrying that the captives appeared to be already in Tehran, and he pointed to "a statement from the Iranians that this is a suspicious and aggressive action." That suggests high-level official involvement, he said.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|