Pelosi must sell her own party on new trade policy

WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faces another stern test of her political skills this week as she struggles to win over members of her party unhappy with a new trade policy that senior Democrats brokered with the Bush administration.

The issue, which provokes deep-seated divisions among Democrats, is expected to prompt tough questions at a party caucus Tuesday for Pelosi (D-San Francisco) and other party leaders who signed off on the deal.

Many Democrats have historically supported free trade, particularly centrists, but a growing number -- including many freshmen whose victories gave Democrats control of the House for the first time in 40 years -- argue that recent trade agreements cost U.S. jobs.

The new policy would apply to pending pacts with Colombia, South Korea, Panama and Peru, requiring foreign trade partners to recognize international labor standards and some environmental protections.

Critics of recent trade agreements have called for such provisions, which the Bush administration has often resisted. But unhappy Democratic lawmakers -- joined by key labor unions and environmentalists -- complain that the deal Pelosi approved does not go far enough and compromises too much with the White House.

In a sign of the unrest, trade was added to the caucus agenda through a petition letter filed Thursday by six House members concerned about the new policy, including Rep. Linda T. Sanchez (D-Lakewood), a former labor lawyer.

Pelosi has displayed considerable skill in guiding her fractious party, especially in the debate over ending the Iraq war.

But the dispute over trade policy may prove unusually difficult, spotlighting as it does concerns that run deep among Democratic voters who have seen millions of jobs in manufacturing and other sectors disappear in recent years, and consider them casualties of outsourcing and overseas competition.

By insisting that U.S. trading partners adhere to stricter labor and environmental standards that raise domestic production costs, advocates say they could level the playing field in the increasingly global economy.

Several labor unions and environmental groups condemned the new trade policy, including the United Steelworkers and Change to Win, while others such as the AFL-CIO offered only qualified support.