WASHINGTON — CIA Director Michael V. Hayden has mounted a highly unusual challenge to the agency's chief watchdog, ordering an internal investigation of an inspector general who has issued a series of scathing reports sharply critical of top CIA officials, according to government officials familiar with the matter.
The move has prompted concerns that Hayden is seeking to rein in an inspector general who has used the office to bring harsh scrutiny of CIA figures including former Director George J. Tenet and undercover operatives running secret overseas prison sites.
The inquiry is focused on the conduct of CIA Inspector General John L. Helgerson and his office. Officials said it was aimed in particular at evaluating whether his office was fair and impartial in its scrutiny of the agency's terrorist detention and interrogation programs. But officials said the probe also spanned other subjects and had expanded since it was launched several months ago.
U.S. intelligence officials who are concerned about the inquiry said it was unprecedented and could threaten the independence of the inspector general position. The probe "could at least lead to appearances he's trying to interfere with the IG, or intimidate the IG or get the IG to back off," said a U.S. official familiar with the probe.
Frederick P. Hitz, who served as the CIA's inspector general from 1990 to 1998, said the move would be perceived as an effort by Hayden "to call off the dogs."
"What it would lead to is an undercutting of the inspector general's authority and his ability to investigate allegations of wrongdoing," Hitz said. "The rank and file will become aware of it, and it will undercut the inspector general's ability to get the truth from them."
But other officials described the probe as a chance to turn the tables on an inspector general who has been accused by some of his targets of treating career officers unfairly and letting personal biases undermine his objectivity.
"There is across-the-board distrust with the IG function and disrespect for Helgerson, who many believe has a personal agenda on issues," said a former high-ranking CIA official who, like others interviewed, spoke on condition of anonymity because of the classified nature of the inspector general's work.
Helgerson, the former official said, "always went in with a presumption of guilt."
Helgerson oversees a large staff of investigators whose activities include detailed examinations of highly classified programs and routine audits of mundane agency functions. He has served as inspector general at the CIA since 2002.
The CIA probe comes at a time when the powers of inspectors general in agencies throughout the federal government are under renewed debate. This month, the Bush administration threatened to veto a House bill that would strengthen the independence of inspectors general by giving them seven-year terms and permit the White House to fire them only for cause.
Hayden, an Air Force general who became CIA director last year, has not been involved in any public clashes with Helgerson. But Hayden has been a staunch defender of the Bush administration's counter-terrorism programs and has publicly lamented what he describes as a tendency by outside observers and critics to second-guess the activities of the nation's intelligence agencies.
In response to questions about the unusual arrangement, CIA spokesman George Little said Hayden "firmly believes that the work of the office of inspector general is critical to the entire agency, and, since taking the helm at CIA, he has accepted the vast majority of its findings." However, Hayden's goal is to "help the office do even better," Little said.
The CIA's review is being led by Robert Deitz, an attorney with long-standing ties to Hayden who was brought in to serve as a senior counselor to the director. Deitz, who served as general counsel at the National Security Agency when Hayden was director there in the 1990s, has assembled a small team of investigators to conduct the probe.
Little, the CIA spokesman, said Deitz came to the post with "an absolute belief in the value of an independent, rigorous Office of Inspector General."
The inquiry has been driven in large part by senior operations officers who have complained to Hayden that they were unfairly criticized by Helgerson in classified reviews of the CIA's secret prisons programs.
The probe is set up to examine "how those people were treated, how the investigations were conducted," said an official familiar with it.
The official declined to discuss the conclusions of the internal investigations, which are classified, but said that "the people who are upset didn't think they were glowing reviews."
Among the issues being explored are whether agency officers were given adequate opportunity to defend their actions, and whether the inspector general's conclusions accurately represented their roles.