Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Bill would ban teens from using gadgets while driving

California and 11 other states weigh laws that bar chatting and texting behind the wheel.

September 10, 2007|From the Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO — Narin Leininger knows about the risks of talking on a cellphone or sending text messages while driving. The 16-year-old high school junior says he would use his phone behind the wheel only in an emergency -- a flat tire, traffic jam or crash.

But if he ever decided to whip out his phone to chat or text with a friend while steering, he wondered, could anyone stop him?

"There's no way a cop could see if you're texting under the steering wheel," said Leininger, a student at San Francisco's Lowell High School.

Still, California and at least 11 other states are considering bills banning teens from using electronic equipment while driving, according to the American Automobile Assn. At least 15 states and the District of Columbia have passed bans.

Supporters say teen-specific regulations -- which generally amend existing laws that apply to everyone, or add provisions to graduated licensing laws for young motorists -- reduce driver distraction and save lives.

Opponents say that they're another example of government meddling into citizens' private behavior -- and that teaching students proper driving skills is a parent's duty, not the state's.

California's bill could land on Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's desk this week. Schwarzenegger, whose daughter turned 16 and began driving last year, hasn't indicated whether he'd sign it.

The legislation, introduced by California Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto), would take effect in July. It would ban 16- and 17-year-olds from using any electronic device while driving, including cellphones, text-messaging devices, laptop computers, pagers, walkie-talkies and hand-held computers, even those with "hands-free" features.

Last year, Schwarzenegger signed a bill that prohibits all drivers from holding a cellphone while driving. The measure, which takes effect in July, allows hands-free devices.

Violators of the proposed bill for teens would get a $20 fine for the first offense and a $50 fine for subsequent offenses, but they wouldn't get points on their driving records.

"I introduced this bill for one simple reason -- it will save lives," Simitian said.

There's been little scientific research directly linking texting and car accidents, but anecdotal evidence -- and common sense -- suggest it is too distracting.

Last month, police in suburban Phoenix blamed a teen's text-messaging habit for a head-on crash that killed two people. Ashley D. Miller, 18, wasn't wearing a seat belt and was texting on her cellphone while driving in Peoria, Ariz., when her Ford pickup crossed a lane and smashed into a Chrysler PT Cruiser, killing 40-year-old driver Stacey A. Stubbs.

In June, a head-on wreck in New York's Finger Lakes region killed five teenagers who had graduated from high school five days earlier. Although police didn't conclusively link texting with the deaths, the crash happened only moments before the 17-year-old driver had sent and received text messages.

The accident -- in which the teen's SUV swerved into oncoming traffic, hit a tractor-trailer and burst into flames -- prompted New York state Sen. Carl L. Marcellino (R-Syosset) to introduce a bill banning writing, sending or reading text messages while driving.

"You need two thumbs to use these devices," Marcellino told legislators in Albany. "How do you hold the wheel? You have to take your eyes off the road to see the screen or see the letters. It's terribly dangerous."

According to a 2001 report by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 16-year-old drivers have a crash rate three times higher than that of 17-year-olds, five times greater than 18-year-olds and almost 10 times greater than drivers ages 30 to 59.

"Bottom line, this law will most likely save lives -- not just teenagers but anyone on the road," said Dave Melton, director of transportation technical consulting services for the Hopkinton, Mass.-based Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety. "Frankly it would behoove all of us to do away with distractions that interfere with decisions we make while driving."

But last month in Sacramento, Sen. Tom McClintock (R-Thousand Oaks) portrayed the legislation as an attempt to regulate behavior. His 17-year-old daughter recently missed curfew after a play rehearsal, and McClintock and his wife were happy they could call her.

"It's midnight, she's not home," McClintock said. "We were able to reach her on the cellphone. She was on her way home. She was fine."

Stephen Wallace, chairman and chief executive of Boston-based Students Against Destructive Decisions, agreed that parents should set the rules. He urged adults to talk to kids about safe driving, and said parents should be good examples and put down the phone when they're at the wheel.

But family discipline doesn't mitigate the need for laws, he said.

"Any regulation in place has merits as a way to reinforce a message that they should receive at home," Wallace said. "The more places they get this message the more they're likely to respond."

Many teens agree.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|