Port funds could be diverted
Cargo container fees intended to clean up local pollution could be shared with the Central Valley and other areas under a proposal by the Schwarzenegger administration.
SACRAMENTO -- — Money collected in Los Angeles County to clean up its polluted ports would be shared with the Central Valley under a proposal by the Schwarzenegger administration that is drawing opposition from Southern California leaders.
Sponsors of legislation that would charge shippers about $60 a container in the ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach and Oakland had intended to use the money in areas close to those cities' ports to reduce traffic congestion and air pollution.
But after the bill passed both legislative houses, aides to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger proposed last-minute changes that would funnel some of the money to a statewide transportation fund and the California Air Resources Board, which could use it in areas such as the Central Valley, which suffers poor air quality from traffic, agriculture and other sources.
"Do we believe the Central Valley has huge problems that need help? Yes," said state Sen. Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach), author of SB 974. "Do we believe that emasculating this bill to meet those needs will meet anyone's needs? No."
Lowenthal said he hoped for a compromise, but vowed to fight the changes even if it meant risking a veto by putting the bill, as passed, on the governor's desk.
"Their amendments go further than we are willing to go," he said. "It puts the bill in jeopardy."
Fresno Mayor Alan Autry said he had been pushing the governor to make sure the fees helped the whole state.
"Pollution doesn't stop at the port," Autry said. "Most of those trucks will be loaded and drive right through the San Joaquin Valley."
L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa wants the money to stay where it is generated, said Matt Szabo, a spokesman.
"Any amendments to the legislation must preserve local control over container fees and ensure that the revenue is dedicated to the region where it is collected," Szabo said.
A Schwarzenegger spokeswoman declined to discuss specific proposals. "It is not a practice of ours to negotiate legislation in the media," said Rachel Cameron. "However, I want to stress that our office has been working with the senator for nearly a year."
"It's very troubling," Tim Carmichael, senior policy director for the Coalition for Clean Air, said of the proposed amendments.
The two sides are scheduled to meet today.
On Wednesday, the Senate went through 382 bills and resolutions, deferring action on many of them but approving others as it hopes to wrap up action by the end of this month.
- COUNTYWIDE - 10% Increase Sought for Pollution Fees Jun 02, 1990
- Wayne Nastri Named to Seat on Air Board Aug 20, 1997
- Fee Hikes Would Aid Smog Fight Aug 21, 2004
