"Any allegation of wrongdoing is nothing more than garbage being shoveled by the city attorney's political opponents hiding behind the cloak of anonymity," Velasquez said in one such comment. "This is a classic political smear."
For months, rumors had circulated at City Hall that Delgadillo was under investigation, that his e-mails had been seized and that he had hired a defense lawyer.
Speculation began percolating after FBI agents met with representatives of the Information Technology Agency, the city department that retains e-mails and other electronic records.
The Jan. 15 meeting focused on the city's protocol for retaining electronic messages, said the department's general manager, Randi Levin. As of Tuesday evening, a spokesman for Levin said her agency had received no written or oral requests from law enforcement for e-mails from Delgadillo or any other employee of the city attorney's office.
In recent days, harder evidence began to surface.
Mars, who has been active in city politics for more than a decade, told The Times two weeks ago that her printing company had received a subpoena. Mars said she had not personally seen the legal writ, but she was told by a company official that it related to Delgadillo's wife.
Then late Monday, the San Francisco Chronicle published a story reporting that FBI agents based in San Francisco had interviewed an unknown number of people about Delgadillo -- the first public emergence of the rumors.
During remarks at an unrelated news conference Tuesday, Chick became the first person to publicly say that she had been interviewed by agents and prosecutors who had questions about the city's chief prosecutor. Chick refused to go into what had been asked two weeks ago. The meeting lasted 30 to 40 minutes and dealt with her attempt to conduct a performance audit of Delgadillo's office, Chick said.
The proposed audit triggered the latest political feud between the two citywide elected officials. The controller said she did not initiate the meeting with the federal authorities.
Spokesmen for the FBI and the U.S. attorneys in San Francisco and Los Angeles have repeatedly declined to comment.
Although it is not publicly known why the case is being handled in San Francisco rather than Los Angeles, the mechanics of any Delgadillo probe would immediately be complicated by the fact that the city attorney has run, or has considered running, for other elected law enforcement posts in the city and beyond. Delgadillo seriously weighed a run against Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley and lost a bid for state attorney general in 2006.