Martin Sheen opposing drug rehab initiative

The actor, who like his son has battled substance abuse, is co-chairing an effort against Prop. 5, which would expand court-sanctioned treatment for addicts instead of jail time.

SACRAMENTO — Martin Sheen, the politically liberal actor who has advocated a tough-love approach to drug addiction, is teaming up with California law-and-order groups to lead the charge against an initiative that would increase funding for rehabilitation programs.

The No on Proposition 5 Campaign announced Wednesday that Sheen would serve as its co-chairman and as the most prominent figure in the battle against the November ballot measure. The opponents said the initiative is too soft on addicts because it would expand the pool of offenders who could be diverted from serving jail or prison time by undergoing treatment.

Sheen, in publicly describing his battles with alcoholism and efforts to help his son, actor Charlie Sheen, to stop abusing drugs, has said the threat of jail time by a judge is needed to force addicts to commit to recovery.

"Fighting drug addiction is very close to my heart," Sheen, who was not available for an interview, said in a statement released by the campaign. "I believe in rehabilitation and not incarceration. But successful rehabilitation needs accountability and so often demands direct intervention in the life of someone who is addicted to drugs."

Charlie Sheen, who overdosed on drugs in 1998, once described walking into an intervention by family members to get him into rehabilitation. And Martin Sheen has said that long ago, he landed in jail several times for being drunk and disorderly.

Eight years ago, Martin Sheen opposed Proposition 36, a precursor to the November initiative that was approved by 61% of voters, creating programs to divert offenders from incarceration into treatment.

"He is a person who has personally struggled with addiction and it's unfortunate," said Margaret Dooley-Sammuli, the manager of the Yes on Proposition 5 campaign.

"But last I checked, he was an actor, not a policy expert, and I think that although his personal experiences need to be respected, they do not define good policy."

The main sponsor of the measure is the Drug Policy Alliance Network, which opposes punitive drug laws and also championed Proposition 36. Dooley-Sammuli said the earlier initiative had saved the state $1.5 billion, mostly in incarceration costs, without increasing crime but that it remains underfunded.


<< Previous Page | Next Page >>
 
 
California | Local