Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsFeuds

LABOR

Faction May Seek Shake-up At Sag

Moderates reportedly will try to oust the union's negotiating team to break a logjam.

December 31, 2008|Richard Verrier

Adding to the drama that has engulfed contract talks between actors and Hollywood studios, moderates on the Screen Actors Guild board are expected to push for the ouster of the union's negotiators.

The move designed to break the six-month deadlock could undermine the guild's current leadership, which some fear is bringing Hollywood to the brink of another strike.

SAG has been shaken internally by rival membership groups that take opposing views about what course of action the 120,000-member union -- the largest in Hollywood -- should take in efforts to reach a new contract with the studios. But despite those sharp differences, the strategy has largely been set by the guild's hard-line leadership, which includes President Alan Rosenberg and Executive Director Doug Allen, the chief negotiator.

Now a coalition of the union's board members, frustrated at the stalemate with the studios that has left SAG in limbo, is expected to call for disbanding the union's negotiating committee at an upcoming meeting.

It also plans to vote against holding a strike referendum and instead replace the negotiating team with a "task force" appointed by the board, said people close to the situation who asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to discuss the plans.

The negotiating committee is dominated by the Membership First faction that has backed Rosenberg and Allen, whose future as the union's chief negotiator also could be on the table at the Jan. 12 meeting, the people said.

The new negotiating team would be constituted to reflect the results of an election last fall, when a group of moderates known as Unite for Strength won key seats on the board, forming a slight majority with supporters in New York and elsewhere.

If approved, the new negotiators would seek to jump-start talks with the studios, probably by consenting to new-media pay terms negotiated by other unions in exchange for improvements in traditional-media pay areas.

Such a move, however, would be a major blow to SAG leaders, who have argued that a strike authorization from members is needed to give them leverage with studios in what they view as landmark negotiations that could determine how actors are paid in the digital era.

But the proposed referendum has faced mounting opposition within the union, including from New York board members who this month called on the union to scrap the vote, arguing that it was ill-timed in light of the sour economy. The recommendation won a significant boost from more than 130 high-profile actors, including Tom Hanks, George Clooney and Sally Field. Other actors, including Martin Sheen, Ed Asner and Mel Gibson, are openly supporting the strike authorization, splintering Hollywood's largest union.

"Obviously, the board has to consider withdrawing the strike authorization given what's happening, and we may need to shake things up to get what we need," said Unite for Strength spokesman Ned Vaughn, who serves as an alternate member of the national board.

Negotiating committee member Anne-Marie Johnson said it would be "undemocratic" to prohibit members from voting on the strike authorization because the studios' final offer was unacceptable.

Johnson defended Allen, saying, "To want to fire your lead negotiator, whose only fault is that he's trying to get the best possible contract he can get, baffles the mind."

Allen could not be reached for comment. He said in an e-mail to members last week that he and Rosenberg postponed plans for the strike referendum, which was scheduled to begin Friday, to "address the unfortunate division and restore consensus." However, he said the vote would proceed immediately after the Jan. 12 meeting.

--

richard.verrier@latimes.com

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|