Los Angeles City Hall has any number of lobbyists, lawyers and consultants who make a good living on their ability to artfully and quietly work the political system.
But rare it is when someone brags -- in writing, no less -- about knowing how to turn handsome profits by persuading city, state and federal officials to let them tap millions of dollars in taxpayer funds.
That may explain why a marketing booklet prepared by Bond Companies, a real estate firm with offices in Los Angeles and Chicago, drew so much attention last week from top officials at the Community Redevelopment Agency.
While urging a city pension board to invest in Bond Companies, the firm's chairman and co-founder, Lawrence Bond, talked up his firm's success at securing taxpayer subsidies, lenient parking requirements and approval for high-density housing projects. In a sales packet to the board, Bond's firm said public dollars were central to its business plan.
Redevelopment commissioner Madeline Janis responded by pushing her agency to put new financial limits on one of the company's projects. Janis also voiced dismay that the company boasted in writing that it has a team assigned to "mine subsidies" at the city and elsewhere.
"Putting all this stuff in your public report . . . about mining subsidies, and how good you are at mining subsidies, it doesn't make the public agencies feel real good about investing," she told the company's representative.
One neighborhood activist went further, saying the 24-page sales booklet from Bond Companies made it appear that subsidies and favorable planning decisions were the rule, not the exception.
"It confirms my worst fears," said Robert Blue, who spent the last three years on the Hollywood Studio District Neighborhood Council. "Whatever the developers propose, whatever subsidies they request, it's all rubber-stamped."
In an era when many private-sector workers do not have pensions at all, the city's two primary public retirement systems have been directing millions of dollars toward companies that rely, at least in part, on other city agencies to make their real estate projects profitable.
One city pension board committed up to $40 million to MacFarlane Partners after that company described taxpayer subsidies as a key way to cut costs in the urban real estate market. MacFarlane is financing L.A. Live, a hotel complex that has permission to tap up to $270 million in tax breaks and city support.
