YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Hip repair for the younger set

July 21, 2008|Judy Foreman | Special to The Times

Jeff Stewart, 43, a house painter and former high school and college athlete, remembers the exact moment his hip gave out: Valentine's Day 2006. "I bent down to paint something low. When I got up, my hip never stopped hurting until I woke up from surgery in January 2007," he said.

The pain, due to an anatomical abnormality made worse by years of wear and tear, was so bad that sometimes all he could do was lie on his recliner and watch TV: "When you are in so much pain, your life is reduced to that."

But like a growing number of young, active people, Stewart eschewed the gold-standard treatment -- total hip replacement surgery -- in favor of a new procedure that, propelled by aggressive marketing featuring vigorous, youngish athletes, is sweeping the U.S.: hip resurfacing.

The main claim for hip resurfacing is that it can preserve more of the thigh bone, making any subsequent surgery more feasible if the initial repair wears out.

Stewart, who paid $30,000 for the procedure and follow-up care because it was not then covered by insurance, is delighted with the results. He can once again "paint million-dollar houses by myself and jump up on roofs."

But many orthopedic surgeons, including the one who did Stewart's surgery, Dr. Carl Talmo at New England Baptist Hospital, are worried about the rate at which doctors, most of whom are still on a steep learning curve for this technically demanding procedure, are jumping to do it.

Resurfacing is so new that statistics on the number of people who have gotten it won't be available until next year, according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

"I'm encouraged, but I also harbor a healthy skepticism toward resurfacing," said Talmo, who added that Stewart was his first -- carefully selected -- patient. "There's tremendous potential for young, active adults," he said, "but we need to be cautious because there is also the potential for this to be over-utilized in the wrong patients.

"Every objective study of hip resurfacing anywhere in the world demonstrates slightly higher failure rates in the first one to five years than total hip replacement," Talmo added.


How the surgery works

In hip resurfacing, surgeons shave down the tip of the thigh bone, capping it with metal, and then scrape out the hip socket into which the cap fits and line the socket with metal. The surgery and recovery with resurfacing can take just as long as with standard replacement surgery and often requires a bigger incision.

Dr. Michael Millis, director of the adolescent and young adult hip unit at Children's Hospital in Boston, put it bluntly: "Resurfacing is very attractive because of its great stability. But it's a harder operation. There's more blood loss. And nobody has 20-year results."

Dr. Donald Reilly, an orthopedic surgeon at New England Baptist Hospital, was blunter still. If a surgeon recommends hip resurfacing, he said, "Run away as fast as you can. Or limp out of that office. There is no advantage and many disadvantages. It won't give you anything more than a total hip replacement, and with some significant downsides."

Strong words, to be sure, especially given the longer use of resurfacing in Australia, Canada, the UK and Belgium. In the U.S., the first device, dubbed the "Birmingham hip," was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in May 2006. The FDA approved a second device, the Cormet, in July 2007. More devices are in the pipeline, as manufacturers seek to capture a growing market: athletic, healthy baby boomers with strong bones but hips damaged by congenital abnormalities such as Stewart's or by osteoarthritis.

Normally, the hip joint is a smoothly functioning ball and socket, with the "ball," the head of the thigh bone (femur) fitting snugly, and painlessly, into the "socket," a cup-shaped bone of the pelvis called the acetabulum.

In total hip replacement surgery, which is performed nearly 300,000 times a year, according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, doctors cut off the head of the femur and insert a rod with a metal ball on top into the leg bone. They also remove bone from the pelvic "socket" and insert a plastic "cup" into which the metal ball fits. Replacement surgery "works 98% of the time," said Reilly of New England Baptist. The devices can be metal, ceramic, plastic or a combination.

But if, after 10 to 20 years, the patient needs the hip replaced again, the second surgery is more difficult because so much bone was removed the first time.


Replace versus resurface

In other words, total hip replacement is fine for older people whose remaining life expectancy more or less equals that of the hip replacement. But for young people such as Stewart, who might need two or three revisions, resurfacing may make more sense.

Los Angeles Times Articles