House Democrats may split spy bill
A two-part vote on the espionage legislation would allow political cover to lawmakers who oppose giving retroactive immunity to phone companies that participated in a secret eavesdropping program.
WASHINGTON — Under pressure to end an impasse over espionage legislation, House Democrats are considering a plan to vote on a bill next week that would give the government broad new eavesdropping authorities but strip out a provision that would protect phone companies from lawsuits.
- » The "Democratic Peace"- A Skeptic's View"International Order and Individual Liberty" - Sample chapter, essays, reviews.www.internationalorder.org
- » history BooksCompare prices and retailers to get great deals at Yahoo! Shopping.shopping.yahoo.com
- » Congress Cosmetic MedicalRead reviews for this Doctor & find more local Medical Info.Losangeles.Citysearch.com
Senior Democratic aides said the plan would set up a separate vote on the divisive issue of whether to grant legal immunity to phone companies that took part in a secret wiretapping program authorized by President Bush after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
"The objective would be to pass something that is less controversial," yet still allow Democrats to register their objections to the immunity provision, said one senior Democratic aide, speaking on condition of anonymity because House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) and other party leaders have yet to reach a decision on the matter.
The proposal emerged Friday as a possible endgame in the drawn-out congressional debate over how to overhaul laws that govern when and how American spy agencies can intercept international e-mails and phone calls coming into the United States.
Republican officials said they likely would back the proposal to divide the bill into two pieces, as long as there was no delay in taking up the immunity provision. "We would be OK with that as long as the immunity provision [can] become law," said Michael Steel, spokesman for House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio).
Officials from both sides acknowledged that there are probably enough votes in the House to pass the measure protecting telephone companies. But splitting the bill would give Democrats who oppose the immunity provision political cover for voting in favor of the broader legislation.
The issue has divided lawmakers since it was revealed in December 2005 that Bush had secretly authorized a program in which the National Security Agency intercepted the international phone calls and e-mails of U.S. citizens without prior court approval.
Critics contend that the program violated laws passed in the late 1970s that cracked down on abuses by U.S. spy agencies. Pelosi and many other Democrats have fought against granting legal liability protection to companies who took part in the program, saying that to do so would be to shield private firms for their involvement in an illegal operation.
- » The "Democratic Peace"- A Skeptic's View"International Order and Individual Liberty" - Sample chapter, essays, reviews.www.internationalorder.org
- » history BooksCompare prices and retailers to get great deals at Yahoo! Shopping.shopping.yahoo.com
- » Congress Cosmetic MedicalRead reviews for this Doctor & find more local Medical Info.Losangeles.Citysearch.com
|
|
|
|
