YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections


Numbers crunch in LAPD buildup

A lot has changed since the mayor proposed adding 1,000 officers -- primarily the economy.

May 05, 2008|David Zahniser | Times Staff Writer

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and the city's top financial experts were stunned last fall when a steep drop in tax revenue punched a hole in the city budget -- forcing them to propose an array of fee hikes and cuts in public services.

But the city's $406-million budget shortfall is also a product of two pivotal policy choices made by Villaraigosa since taking office in 2005: adding 1,000 officers to the Los Angeles Police Department and hiking the pay of unionized city workers.

On paper, paying for the new officers looks easy. If the City Council approves the mayor's budget, annual trash fees will have been raised by more than $140 million since 2006. But hiring so many new officers is much trickier when home sales are flat, sales taxes are down and city employee pay raises have cost nearly $90 million extra with each successive year.

To continue the LAPD expansion in the midst of an economic downturn, Villaraigosa has called for reductions in library hours and supplies, animal shelter hours, park rangers and maintenance, summer recreation workers and arts programs.

With another grim year expected in 2009-10, the budget woes pose a major question for the mayor: Even if he reaches his goal of 1,000 new officers, can that rapid buildup -- his No. 1 priority -- be sustained?

As they review the mayor's budget, some council members aren't sure. Villaraigosa will have few options for big increases in fees next year. And Councilman Greig Smith, a Republican who is a reserve police officer, warned that the mayor is trying to hire too many officers too quickly -- a strategy that threatens to create a bigger budget mess by 2011, the year that all the new officers will be on the job.

"We're digging ourselves a hole," said Smith, who sits on the council's Budget and Finance Committee. "And the question is, is the hole so deep that we can't dig ourselves out?"

Three years into his term, Villaraigosa has his hard-fought goal of 1,000 new officers squarely within his sights. The LAPD will have added more than 800 by next year, just as the mayor asks voters to reelect him. And the number will reach 1,000 during the start of a second term, assuming he is reelected.

That initiative is coming at an increasingly steep price. In Villaraigosa's proposed 2008-09 budget, the cost of the police expansion is about $73 million, equal to nearly one-fifth of the city's budget shortfall. The next year, the cost of the LAPD buildup is expected to reach $114 million -- equivalent to nearly 40% of the budget shortfall projected for that year, $293 million.

Those figures do not take into account the additional employees needed to support the new officers: payroll clerks, training officers and maintenance crews, among others. The city's top budget officials are trying to determine, once those costs are factored in, whether the trash fee increase will cover the total cost of the buildup.

As recently as February, Villaraigosa warned that any slowdown in officer hiring would be greeted by his veto pen. And his advisors sound exasperated with pleas to slow police hiring or protect other programs from cuts.

There will never be a right time to expand the Police Department, regardless of the economy, said Deputy Mayor Sally Choi, who prepared this year's budget. With about 9,700 sworn officers, the LAPD is still small by big-city standards, mayoral aides said.

"In difficult times like this, you have to stick with the core values of the city, and that's ensuring public safety," she said.

The budget reflects the shift in priorities. In the two years since Villaraigosa started the officer-hiring plan, public safety -- police and fire protection -- has grown from 64% of the city's discretionary budget to nearly 70%, according to the city's chief legislative analyst's office. That means the share of all other programs is shrinking.

That fact has not gone unnoticed by advocates for parks, libraries and other services. Some who testified against the budget cuts last week said the Police and Fire departments should not go unscathed when money is scarce.

"They're saying we have to spend a vast amount of money on one resource in the city, and everything else has to be hung out to dry," said Kim Cooper, a resident of Lincoln Heights who co-founded Save LAPL -- Save L.A. Public Library -- earlier this year to fend off cuts and library fee hikes. "That's unfair, and I'm pro-cop."

Villaraigosa aides say the mayor is determined to avoid repeating the mistakes of his predecessors, who also ran for office on promises to expand the LAPD. A decade ago, then-Mayor Richard Riordan got within striking range of adding 1,000 officers only to see the council halt the expansion over fears about the plan's financial sustainability.

Five years ago, then-Mayor James K. Hahn fell into the same trap, with council members saying there wasn't enough money to support his planned LAPD expansion. Hahn's final budget added 130 officers.

Los Angeles Times Articles