Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsHomeowners

'Walkaway' homeowners may be myth

Bankers and analysts say many default even when they can afford payments. But there is no hard evidence.

May 11, 2008|Michael A. Hiltzik | Times Staff Writer

Bankers and housing market analysts are warning of a chilling new trend in the mortgage world: homeowners voluntarily defaulting on their loans even though they can afford to make the payments.

It's known colloquially as "walking away," or more jocularly as "jingle mail," for the sound your house keys supposedly make when you mail them back to your bank.

It's a way of saying that Americans are beginning to apply a cold financial calculation to home ownership: When a home's value has fallen below what is owed on its mortgage, they think it makes no sense to keep up the payments.

"That is going on, clearly, and there's lots of evidence of that in the market," Donald K. Truslow, senior executive vice president of Wachovia Corp., said in a conference call with investors last month.

A few weeks earlier, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson had waggled a stern finger at homeowners contemplating walking away from affordable mortgages: Do that, and you're no better than a "speculator," he said.

Elsewhere, media reports and Internet postings are rife with stories about the trend and a supposed sea change in American attitudes toward debt.

But there's a major problem with all this talk about the phenomenon of solvent homeowners walking away: There doesn't appear to be any hard evidence that it's actually happening.

'Hard to quantify'

When pressed for the number of walkaways who could afford their mortgage payments, major banks and lender groups could not produce figures. Nor could the Mortgage Bankers Assn., the leading trade group for housing lenders.

Truslow acknowledged during the conference call April 14 that walkaways were "hard to quantify." A Wachovia spokesman said this week that "we have heard anecdotally that people are walking away" but that the bank had no hard numbers.

Bank of America Chairman and Chief Executive Kenneth D. Lewis, whose company is acquiring mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp., complained about "a change in social attitudes toward default" in an interview with the Wall Street Journal in December.

In response to questions from The Times, Bank of America spokesman Terry Francisco said the bank had seen indications that some homeowners were taking pains to keep their credit card accounts current at the expense of their mortgage balances, often by raiding their home equity lines to pay their cards, a reversal of traditional customer priorities.

But he said the bank did not have "firm figures" on how many homeowners were unnecessarily defaulting on their mortgages.

Others suggest that it may be impossible to find out.

"How would you know what someone's true ability to pay would be?" asked Todd Sinai, an associate professor of real estate at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. "I'm not sure you could even come up with a definition."

At Fannie Mae, the government-chartered company that owns or guarantees billions of dollars in home mortgages, Senior Vice President Marianne Sullivan conceded that there was growing "folklore" about residential walkaways and said that the phenomenon was more likely connected to investors than people who live in their homes, or "owner-occupants."

"The vast majority of borrowers, we find, have been acting in good faith," she said. "If they get behind, they are interested in working with their lender."

Bruce Marks, chief executive of Neighborhood Assistance Corp. of America, a Boston-based nonprofit agency that helps strapped homeowners, said that the notion that legions of borrowers are deciding not to pay is an "urban myth" that largely reflects the mortgage industry's desire to blame homeowners, rather than lenders, for the surge in problem loans.

Shifting the blame

Marks and others assert that mortgage bankers have an incentive to blame the rise in delinquencies and foreclosures on borrowers skipping out on obligations they're financially able to meet, because that diverts attention from the lenders' role in the mortgage crisis.

"So many of the loans made were irresponsible -- for the borrowers and for the lenders," said Kurt Eggert, an expert on predatory lending at Chapman University School of Law in Orange County. "Lenders have an interest in painting themselves as responsible, even caring entities. They want to cast blame for the sub-prime meltdown as much as possible on their borrowers."

It is generally agreed that the real culprit in the meltdown is the proliferation of exotic mortgages that hit borrowers -- many with paltry down payments, and therefore almost no home equity -- with huge payment shocks in the early years of the loan. The new payments are often raised to levels that borrowers could never have afforded but expected to escape via refinancing or the sale of the house in a rising market.

When home values fell instead, their exit strategy evaporated.

Advertisement
Los Angeles Times Articles
|
|
|