Iraqi lawmakers clash over U.S. troop withdrawal plan
Foes of the current Status of Forces Agreement loudly denounce the pact, which would pull all U.S. troops out of Iraq by Jan. 1, 2012.
Reporting from Baghdad — Opponents of a U.S.-Iraqi plan that would let American forces stay in Iraq through 2011 blocked debate on the issue today during a raucous session of the national Parliament.
At the same time, more political blocs expressed wariness of the pact, dealing a setback to American and Iraqi officials who had hoped the deal would pass into law without fierce political infighting.
There is no indication that the plan's opponents can muster the votes to defeat it in Parliament, but Prime Minister Nouri Maliki needs broad-based support for the agreement to avoid deepening rifts that have hobbled efforts at reconciliation. Maliki also faces provincial and national elections in 2009 and cannot afford to be seen as pushing a plan overly favorable to the Americans, as foes have described it.
The plan would require U.S. combat troops to leave Iraqi cities, towns and villages by July 1. All troops would leave Iraq by Jan. 1, 2012. American forces would be barred from undertaking unilateral missions, would be subject to Iraqi jurisdiction under certain circumstances and would not be able to conduct raids or attacks on neighboring countries. It would replace a United Nations mandate expiring Jan. 1.
"It is the best current available option," said Khalid Assadi, a lawmaker from Maliki's Dawa party, which has been backed by several other Shiite groups and by Kurdish parties.
"If we compare the agreement to the [U.N.] Security Council order extending the permission for the presence of [foreign troops], the agreement is better for the Iraqi people because it has fixed dates for withdrawal," said Kurdish lawmaker Muhsin Sadoun.
Maliki said the United States met many Iraqi demands during the eight months of talks leading to the pact, but opponents say the deal doesn't go far enough to ensure Iraqi sovereignty
"The pact will not give legal and legitimate protection for Iraqi assets," said Hassan Shimari, the head of the small Fadhila party, in announcing that its lawmakers opposed the pact. Shimari complained that the country's various political groups were not allowed to take part in the negotiations or to propose amendments. "All we got were viewpoints of some political sides about what the American side wants," Shimari said before the Parliament session opened. "For all these reasons, we will not vote for the pact."
