Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsLEGISLATION

Activists decry Santa Barbara oil vote coverage

FROM OUR BLOGS

September 09, 2008|Kenneth R. Weiss and Margot Roosevelt, Times Staff Writers

It's been frustrating to local anti-oil activists to see such attention given to a vote by Santa Barbara County supervisors in favor of new oil drilling off the county's coastline.

"It was distressing to see the media make this a big deal when the county board flips on this issue every few years," said Linda Krop, chief counsel of the Santa Barbara-based Environmental Defense Center.


Advertisement

The Santa Barbara City Council is about to weigh in on the matter. It's not likely to make much news. Why? Because the city has been steadfastly opposed to new offshore oil drilling since the 1969 platform blowout coated the city's beaches with viscous goo.

The city's resolution, scheduled for a vote today, would reiterate that "the City of Santa Barbara continues its strong support of the state and federal moratoriums on new offshore oil and gas leasing off the Santa Barbara coastline."

The vote is likely to be unanimous, or nearly so.

What gets lost in the offshore oil debate, now playing out in this year's presidential campaign, is that oil companies own 37 existing leases in the Santa Barbara Channel that have never been developed.

To be sure, drilling on some of these undersea tracts has been thwarted by state and federal regulatory skirmishes.

Other reasons include wild fluctuation in oil prices over the years and the fact that many major oil companies resold the leases because they were considered more trouble than they were worth -- at least compared to drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. Much of the oil off the Santa Barbara coast is thick, sour crude, more suitable for making asphalt than high-grade fuels to power jets or even high-performance SUVs.

Lack of budget stymies environmental agenda

California's multibillion-dollar budget impasse is holding up more than funding for state agencies and programs. About 870 bills, passed by both houses of the Legislature, are in limbo, including landmark environmental legislation that would have major economic and health effects. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has said he will not sign any bills until the Legislature, deadlocked in partisan conflict, can come up with a budget.

The Planning and Conservation League, a Sacramento-based nonprofit, has compiled a list of 15 top-priority bills yet to be signed by the governor.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|