Rebellious House Republicans want to be part of the bailout debate

They say their proposal has forced the administration and Democratic leaders to consider alternatives to the $700-billion Wall Street rescue plan.

WASHINGTON — On two consecutive mornings this week, top Bush administration officials went to Capitol Hill to sell House Republicans on the $700-billion Wall Street bailout. Each time, they failed to close the deal.

So with fewer than 50 of the 199 party members ready to back the administration plan, House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) on Wednesday deputized nine House Republicans -- a cross-section of conservatives and moderates -- to come up with another way to rescue the U.S. economy that the rebels would support.

The idea behind the plan they came up with had already been studied and rejected by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson.

The Republican initiative threw a monkey wrench into negotiations just as House and Senate Democrats were closing in on a breakthrough deal with the administration. But as members of the group and other Republicans explained it, their actions served at least one purpose: They forced the administration and Democratic leaders to consider alternatives and include the House Republicans in the process.

"Now we're a part of the game," said Rep. Ray LaHood (R-Ill.). But how they got into the game has angered Democratic leaders.

On Thursday afternoon, members of Boehner's working group issued a one-page proposal of "Economic Rescue Principles" that called for a dramatic shift in the way Washington would stabilize Wall Street. Instead of the government purchasing as much as $700 billion in debt-laden mortgage-backed securities to get credit flowing again, the plan called for the government to insure those securities, with Wall Street paying the tab instead of taxpayers.

Although House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) and others negotiating a deal don't oppose the insurance idea as a component of a bailout, they object to that strategy as the centerpiece.

"No one is saying that we shouldn't have insurance, but not as a substitute for the Paulson plan," said Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. "Then there's no deal."

Frank chastised Republicans for waiting five days after the administration released its plan to make their proposal, and for not raising the issue during a hearing of his committee attended by Paulson.

"None of them asked Paulson about it, because I think they knew he would pooh-pooh it," Frank said.

Related Articles
Related Keywords
<< Previous Page | Next Page >>
 
 
Business