For reasons that remain elusive, Moreno Valley police last year conducted raids of African American-owned barbershops, allegedly entering the businesses wearing body armor and asking patrons for identification (as far as we know, valid ID has never been required in California in order to get a haircut). When one barber asked for an explanation, he was allegedly handcuffed and hauled out to a police cruiser.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California and a Chicago law firm filed a suit in federal district court Wednesday that says officers targeted five black-owned barbershops in April 2008, accompanying inspectors from the state Board of Barbering and Cosmetology on the pretense that the searches were just routine health-code inspections. Certainly the state has an obligation to inspect barbershops, and police have the right, if they obtain search warrants, to determine whether a business is home to illegal activity. But when the two are combined, it looks an awful lot like a police fishing expedition, and it raises serious civil-rights questions. For example, did officers have to buddy up with state officials, who have the right of entry, because they couldn't get a search warrant on their own?
