Advertisement
YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollectionsNational

Dog-fighting videos at heart of Supreme Court case

The court will consider a law that bans the sale or possession of photos or videos of animals being harmed or mutilating one another. Free speech and animal cruelty are issues at stake in the case.

April 21, 2009|David G. Savage

In their appeal, government lawyers said the federal law was needed to halt the trade in dog-fighting videos. "Depictions of animal cruelty . . . are unworthy of 1st Amendment protection," they said. Arguments are scheduled for the fall.

In another case, the court agreed to rule on whether prosecutors can be sued for "manufacturing and fabricating" evidence used to convict a defendant.


Advertisement

In the past, the justices have said prosecutors are immune from being sued for their actions in courts. But a judge in Iowa said it was a different matter if prosecutors were involved in manufacturing evidence.

The ruling came in the case of two men who were convicted of the murder of a security guard, but later freed. They then sued the two former county attorneys for presenting false evidence against them.

A federal appeals court rejected a request to throw out the suit, but the high court said Monday it would hear the prosecutors' claim of immunity.

--

david.savage@latimes.com

Los Angeles Times Articles
|