YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Obama and Bernanke offer hope for the economy

The nation's chief economic policymakers seeks to dispel anxiety about the future but don't minimize the extent of current problems or the size of the challenge ahead.

February 25, 2009|Jim Puzzanghera and Maura Reynolds

WASHINGTON — After months of relentlessly dismal financial news, the nation's chief economic policymakers delivered an unexpected message Tuesday: All is not lost.

President Obama, in an address to a joint session of Congress, sounded notes of optimism for the future while still offering an unvarnished portrait of an economy in crisis.

"The impact of this recession is real, and it is everywhere," Obama said. "But . . . we will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before."

Earlier in the day, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke also offered reassurance, telling a Senate panel that -- with careful management -- the economy could stop shrinking by the end of this year and return to expansion mode next year.

The stock market responded to Bernanke's remarks by staging a powerful rally, nearly erasing a sharp decline the day before that sent major stock indexes to levels not seen since the late 1990s.

Bernanke also sought to allay a particular fear that has haunted investors in recent days -- that the government would nationalize major banks and wipe out shareholders' investments in the process.

The Fed chief said he saw no need for nationalization.

"We don't need majority ownership to work with the banks," Bernanke said. "We have very strong supervisory oversight. We can work with them now to get them to do whatever is necessary to restructure. . . . We don't have to take them over to do that."

Obama vowed Tuesday that his administration would "act with the full force of the federal government" to ensure that big banks had money to lend even if economic conditions worsened.

But he warned that the banking plan "will require significant resources from the federal government -- and yes, probably more than we've already set aside."

The Obama administration and banking regulators had tried Monday to reassure the markets that they did not intend to nationalize banks. But their joint statement was taken as a mixed message: While reiterating support for a private banking system, the administration said it was adopting a new policy allowing for the conversion of the preferred stock the government receives from future capital injections into voting stock.

A voting stake could give federal officials a greater say over how banks are run, and the policy shift was seen by some as a possible step toward full-scale nationalization of certain banks.

Bernanke's comments Tuesday did not erase the uncertainty, but investors took heart. The Dow Jones industrial average shot up 236.16 points, or 3.3%, to 7,350.94.

More broadly, Bernanke and Obama sought to dispel anxiety about the future, but they did not minimize the extent of current problems or the size of the challenge ahead.

"If actions taken by the administration, the Congress and the Federal Reserve are successful in restoring some measure of financial stability," Bernanke said, "there is a reasonable prospect that the current recession will end in 2009 and that 2010 will be a year of recovery."

More bad news may be in the offing as the Treasury Department begins today to conduct what it describes as stress tests of the nation's largest banks, putting them through a rigorous analysis to determine whether they'll need more help to survive in the event of even tougher financial shocks.

But if the banks take their medicine, Obama and Bernanke insisted, the economy will eventually regain its vigor.

"We're going to do a tough evaluation, try to figure out how much hole there is, if there is a hole," Bernanke told the Senate Banking Committee. "In many cases, there's not a hole."

But the Fed chief made clear that he believed it would cause more damage to the country to allow one of its 20 largest banks to fail than it would to help them succeed.

"There is no commitment by any means never to shut down a big bank, absolutely not," Bernanke said. "But I do believe that the major banks we have now can be stabilized."

The Treasury Department is said to be considering converting existing preferred stock in struggling Citigroup Inc. to common stock to boost the company's finances. A number of lawmakers expressed opposition to that approach.

"Common stock is riskier than preferred stock," Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) said. "The American taxpayers are already shouldering a lot of risk these days."

Preferred stockholders are first in line to recoup their investments if a company fails. But owning common stock would give the government the chance to profit if the banks' share prices recovered.

And if converting preferred shares into common shares helps stabilize the banks by reducing the dividends they owe to preferred shareholders, that would benefit taxpayers by helping the overall economy, said James A. Wilcox, a professor at UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business.

"The reverberations on the economy as a whole have enormous repercussions for the taxpayer," he said.

Los Angeles Times Articles