Advertisement

In Myanmar, expectations were low for U.N. visit

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon expresses disappointment over not being allowed to see pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi. A former prisoner says he's not surprised.

July 05, 2009|Charles McDermid

BANGKOK — Former political prisoner Win Tin says he wasn't surprised that U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's visit to Myanmar to plead for the release of pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi ended in failure.

Ban said Saturday that he was "deeply disappointed" that Senior Gen. Than Shwe refused to allow him to see Suu Kyi, adding that she should be released "without delay." He said Myanmar's human rights record was a matter of serious concern.


Advertisement

But Win Tin, 80, a former journalist and founding member of Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy, said he didn't expect a breakthrough.

"I am not being cynical, but I expected nothing much from the visit. Even though he came at the invitation of the regime, it can be seen as the regime's response to worldwide pressure due to Aung San Suu Kyi's trial," he said by telephone Saturday from Myanmar, also known as Burma. "If there is no real political progress, we will see Burma under a military dictatorship for many years."

Since Win Tin was released in September after 19 years in Yangon's Insein Prison, he has worn his prison uniform as a sign of defiance. Last month, he was barred from testifying on Suu Kyi's behalf.

Suu Kyi has been detained for nearly 14 of the last 20 years. She was charged with violating her house arrest after an American swam to her home uninvited and stayed there for two days. The American, John Yettaw of Falcon, Mo., is also being held.

Ban said his two-day visit, which ended Saturday, would be used to call for the release of Myanmar's estimated 2,100 political prisoners, promote dialogue between the regime and the opposition and assure a credible vote in general elections scheduled for next year.

Historian Thant Myint-U, grandson of U Thant, secretary-general of the U.N. from 1961 to '71, said it was unfair to blame Ban for the trip's failure.

"Many governments were pushing him to go, the same governments that can't agree among themselves on what to do about Burma," he said. "As long as the big powers are deadlocked, it's easy to push the U.N. secretary-general into the limelight, and then blame him for not producing results."

Pro-democracy opposition and exile groups were left with the largely ineffectual tools they started with: international outcry and economic sanctions.

"The trouble with sanctions is that they are easy to put into effect and very difficult to get rid of. If you want to achieve an objective, sometimes you have to give people a way out," said David Steinberg, a Myanmar expert at Georgetown University.

Los Angeles Times Articles
|