YOU ARE HERE: LAT HomeCollections

Roger Federer beats Andy Roddick in nail-biter Wimbledon final

Federer nudged past Roddick in four hours, 18 minutes, 5-7, 7-6 (6), 7-6 (5), 3-6, 16-14, with a final set that seemed like it would never end.

July 06, 2009|Chuck Culpepper

WIMBLEDON, ENGLAND — As a deathless fifth set bloated to 6-6 and to 10-10 and to an inconceivable 14-14, as it elongated to 95 minutes and left the corner scoreboard chockablock with numerals, this latest masterpiece of a Wimbledon final seemed to heave with the audacious aim of rivaling its hallowed predecessor.

Whether it succeeded in the end would prove debatable, but nobody at Centre Court on a sunny, blustery Sunday at the All England Club will lament having witnessed a men's singles final so commendable that the fans wound up chanting the name of the man who did not win.

"Roddick! Roddick! Roddick!" they roared, because Roger Federer's 5-7, 7-6 (6), 7-6 (5), 3-6, 16-14 nudge past Andy Roddick in the longest Grand Slam final by games had become the second straight Wimbledon final in which neither player deserved defeat, as well as an implausible case of somebody not winning despite holding serve in his first -- really, now -- 37 tries.

Crestfallen in his chair, his face aimed at the ground as their chant swelled, the 26-year-old native Nebraskan who'd lurked sorrowfully near his childhood daydream stood up, turned around and clapped for an audience that returned the standing ovation.

"Sorry, Pete," Roddick would say moments later toward Pete Sampras in the front row of the Royal Box while holding his third and least appropriate Wimbledon runner-up plate. "I tried to hold him off."

Did he. With an upgraded calm essential for not crumpling into a sobbing heap after a lurid second-set tiebreaker, Roddick almost thwarted Federer's sixth Wimbledon title and his eclipsing of Sampras with a record 15th Grand Slam title. A player even tennis freaks had all but disregarded in recent years -- and whose second-round ouster last year marked his worst Wimbledon -- collaborated with Federer at least to approach the soaring 2008 final of Rafael-Nadal-over-Federer-by-9-7-in-the-fifth.

"I lost," Roddick summarized inaccurately.

Indeed, when the 4-hour 18-minute, serve-and-return bout of staccato points had ended, Federer uttered seven words almost never heard from him in Swiss, German, French or English: "I couldn't control the match at all."

After he somehow withstood what he couldn't control, the first question to a brooding Roddick went: "Did you just lose to the world's greatest tennis player ever?"

Roddick, in a word: "Yes."

For in addition to all the aesthetic shotmaking and the suitable power and the winner's near-record 50 aces of Sunday, Roddick's crowding of Federer in their third Wimbledon final together unearthed another Federer trait long buried beneath the pile: For a placid sort from the tranquil city of Basel, Switzerland, his vessels sure do carry a considerable ration of street fighter.

"You know, he was having trouble picking up my serve today for the first time ever," Roddick said. "He just stayed the course. You know, you didn't even get a sense that he was even really frustrated by it. . . . He gets a lot of credit for a lot of things, but not how many matches he kind of digs deep and toughs it out."

Thirty-seven straight inabilities to break service until the 30th game of the longest closing set in men's Grand Slam history left Federer "frustrated at times," he said, but ultimately proudest of "just the fight, you know, because I'm famous for being all casual and relaxed out there, not showing much."

"I have to give it to him," Sampras said to the BBC, calling Federer "the best in my book" and saying, "Fifteen majors, that's a lot of majors."

The retired seven-time Wimbledon champion had landed in London on Sunday morning for a "surreal" 24-hour stay. He had turned up with his wife, Bridgette Wilson, during the first changeover, ambling down the steps to gathering applause and filling out a Royal Box that included past champions Bjorn Borg, Rod Laver and Manolo Santana. He had waved to the crowd and made Federer temporarily nervous, but not too much so to say hello from the court.

He had come for a coronation but would witness an altercation, odd for a non-rivalry in which one player has won 19 of 21 meetings. The 77 games would trump the 71 from the 1927 Australian Open final, the fifth set would trump the 11-9 of the 1927 French, and by the remarkable tiebreaker of the second set, a day about Roger had become a day about Roger-and-Andy, specifically the 2003 U.S. Open champion's leaner, clearer play abetted by new coach Larry Stefanki.

Consistent, aggressive, probing and searing of serve as ever, just as in his upset of No. 3 Andy Murray in the semifinals, Roddick came upon four set points for a two-set lead when he put away a soft forehand volley for a 6-2 lead in the tiebreaker. Just then, though, Federer played a short-hop, cross-court backhand out of the Federer art gallery, plus a service winner and an ace for 6-5, when came a point sure to lurk cruelly in Roddick's cranium flinging pain.

Los Angeles Times Articles